Are you looking for a Kingston KC 2000 vs WD Black SSD comparison? In the ever-expanding market for the SSDs and NVMe drives for that matter, Western Digital has been one of the prominent players. In recent times, we have been witnessing massive competition across multiple manufacturers. The SSDs coming from the stable of Kingston have also impressed us to a considerable extent. For the sake of this post, we will make a comparison between the two competing SSDs – Kingston KC 2000 vs WD Black.
WD Black SN750 SSD
The WD Black SN750 NVMe is the second generation SSD among the enthusiast range of SSDs. The drive comes with an M.2 slot and also offers an option for the heatsink for enhanced performance and acceptable thermal ranges. The drive comes with functional features like the read speed of 3.47 GB per sec, write speeds of 3 GB per sec and a 515K IOPS read performance.
The SSD is specifically focussed on the PC games. PC gaming is yet to reach the heights that have been achieved by other gaming platforms like console and mobile gaming. This is perhaps an area that Western Digital plans to fill in with its WD Black SSD. Given the fact that the PC games can have storage space requirements of up to 100 GB, Western Digital has pushed the capacities to up to 2 TB with the help of 64-Layer 3D NAND storage technology.
The focus of the speeds ensures that the loading the games onto your SSD should be faster enough, and the game load times also experience an enhanced improvement. The improvements to the previous generation of WD Black range of SSDs has been in the form of a new brand image focussed on making it a game-centric device, an upgraded SSD dashboard and a performance boosting firmware for enhanced performance.
An improved thermal and power efficiency is what has improved on the models. While there is a planned model with the heat sink, it will not be launched anytime soon. The WD Black SN750 is currently available in three capacities of 250 GB, 500 GB, and 1 TB. The product is available with a five-year warranty and the same high degree endurance limits as on the previous models. The other features include SMART and TRIM support. Thermal throttling and NAND management are a few pointers that should make it a great choice in terms of performance.
- An astounding performance in terms of games and other tools
- An excellent power efficiency
- An option with heat sink feature.
- It comes equipped with the software package.
- It needs a few firmware optimizations for a few initial releases.
- The drive is slightly expensive.
Kingston KC 2000
The Kingston KC 2000 marks the attempt of Kingston at some of the best options for the SSD genre. The SSD drive is designed keeping the prosumers and consumers in view and works efficiently in meeting those goals.
The Kingston KC 2000 also meets most of the needs you may have observed in the first SSD from Kingston in the form of HyperX Predator. The drive is available in four different capacities 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB, and 2 TB. The speeds read 3.2 GB per sec read and 2.2 GB per sec write speeds. The 4K random performance reads at 350,000 IOPS read performance and 275,000 IOPS write performance for enhanced excellence.
The endurance characteristics are also impressive enough on the new Kingston KC 2000. You will also find the high-end security mechanisms making it one of the preferred options making it one of the best security options you can opt for. The drive comes with the self-encrypting features to protect all your data on the drive. The security features are powerful enough and feature TLC Opal 2.0 security management software and eDrive as well.
- A solid and wonderful performance
- It comes with a software support package
- A high-end endurance
- Peak performance may not indeed be up to the mark.
- Aesthetics of the drive leaves a little to be desired
The Comparison Chart for the best features offered by the two SSDs: Kingston KC 2000 vs WD Black
Having gone through the basic features and functionalities provided by the two competing SSD drives, it may be a good idea to compare them in a side by side chart. This head-on comparison should help you focus on the specific features that you are looking ahead to.
|Features / Particulars||Kingston KC 2000||WD Black|
|Capacities||250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB||250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB|
|Form factor||M.2 2280||M.2 2280 Single-Sided|
|Interface||PCIe version 3.0||PCIe version 3.0|
|Protocol||NVMe 1.3||NVMe 1.3|
|Controller||Silicon Motion SM2262EN||WD NVMe Architecture|
|DRAM||DDR3L||SK Hynix DDR4|
|NAND Flash||Toshiba BiCS4 96L TLC||SanDisk 64-Layer TLC|
|Sequential read speed||3 GB per sec for 250 and 500 GB|
3.2 GB per sec for 1 TB and 2 TB
|3.1 GB per sec for 250 GB|
3.47 GB per sec for 500GB and 1 TB
3.4 GB per sec for 2 TB
|Sequential write speed||1.1 GB per sec for 250 GB|
2 GB per sec for 500 GB
2.2 GB per sec for 1 TB and 2 TB
|1.6 GB per sec for 250 GB|
2.6 GB per sec for 500 GB
3.0 GB per sec for 1 TB
2.9 GB per sec for 2 TB
|Random read speed||350,000 IOPS for 250, 500 and 1 TB|
250,000 IOPS for 2 TB
|220,000 IOPS for 250 GB|
420,000 IOPS for 500 GB
515,000 IOPS for 1 TB
480,000 IOPS for 2 TB
|Random write speed||200, 000 IOPS for 250 GB|
250,000 IOPS for 500 GB and 2 TB
275,000 IOPS for 1 TB
|180,000 IOPS for 250 GB|
380,000 IOPS for 500 GB
560,000 IOPS for 1 TB
550,000 IOPS for 2 TB
|Encryption support||AES-256 / Opal 2.0 / eDrive||Not applicable|
|Endurance limit||150 TBW for 250 GB|
300 TBW for 500 GB
600 TBW for 1 TB
1200 TBW for 2 TB
|200 TBW for 250 GB|
300 TBW for 500 GB
600 TBW for 1 TB
1200 TBW for 2 TB
|Warranty||Five years||Five years|
Which among them would we prefer? Kingston KC 2000 vs WD Black
Kingston has been one of the unique options. The drive should be able to handle all your tasks with ease and simplicity. You can find it offering you excellent performance in terms of content creation and 3D modeling, to name just a few. However, the cache isn’t much impressive enough.
However, high-end encryption offered on the Kingston KC 2000 should make it one of the best options for use with your business applications. With the hardware security provided on the KC 2000 should ideally make it a formidable choice in terms of security and safety. Pricing is also almost on the same lines as the competitor, WD Black SN750 SSD drive.
The WD Black also has an overwhelming performance characteristic. The drive is an excellent choice for those looking for high performance and reliability characteristics. The drive has been considered to be one of the best options you can opt for. If you are a gamer, this should be the option that you can choose. Moreover, high-end performance figures should be what should ideally make it one of the formidable choices by almost every standard. The substantial endurance limits are what would make it a great opportunity you would prefer to go with. The missing feature when you compare it to the Kingston KC 2000 is the lack of any options for security and encryption.
Ultimately, the best you would want to go with among those two options would be to choose the specific options based on the requirements you may have. Go with the Kingston SSD if you prefer safety and security provided by the encryption features and check out the possibilities in WD Black if you think performance takes the lead – especially if you are a gamer.
That was all we have had with the concise review and comparison between the two competing SSD drives – Kingston KC 2000 vs WD Black SSD. We assume the correlation between the two competing products should help you arrive at the right solution for the right kind of SSD drive among those two.
Check them out and go with the right SSD that rightly meets your exact requirements. Thanks for visiting. Do let us know your thoughts by leaving a comment below.
More on SSD based storage drives:
- Samsung 970 Evo vs Evo Plus NVMe SSD
- Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400
- Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860