Storage SystemsSeagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860 Specs February 26, 201919883 views0Share By IG ShareSSDs or Solid State Drives are what you would need to build a high-performance PC. If you are looking for the best SSDs – either you are replacing your old SSD or upgrading from a conventional spindle based HDD – Samsung, Seagate, and Crucial are the three major players worth the attempt in the mid-segment. Let us today check out the three options from these three players – Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860. We will understand the three SSDs and compare them together.Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.Table of Contents ToggleSeagate Barracuda – An OverviewCrucial MX500 – A Sneak PeekSamsung Evo 860 – An IntroductionA Few Pros and Cons of all the three optionsSeagate BarracudaCrucial MX500Samsung Evo 860Specifications Comparison: Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860Seagate Barracuda – An OverviewCheck on AmazonSeagate made a re-entry into the SSD market through their Barracuda SSD line in 2018. Even though there were no recent developments in the SSD sphere for the last five years or so, the density and the process node optimization have increased dramatically.However, the Seagate Barracuda does not come with any revolutionary design but uses the old Phison S10 controller. It makes use of the Toshiba’s 64-layer 3D TLC NAND as its internal flash storage. The Seagate Barracuda SSD has the features in tune with most of the mainstream SSDs currently available. Of course, there is a need for the low queue depths and on mixed workloads and this where the older controller may be an issue compared to the new generation SSDs.Crucial MX500 – A Sneak PeekCheck on AmazonWhen it comes to the market share of the SSDs, the fight is indeed between the two players – Crucial and Samsung. Of course, Samsung is the leader even now, but the Crucial has been challenging it in a significant manner.Crucial MX500 is the first consumer SSD to come with the Micron’s newest NAND. The Crucial MX500 comes with four capacities and two individual form factors. However, the launch event came with only 1 TB capacity. The Crucial MX500 offers you the 560/512 MB/s of sequential read/write throughput. The Random performance peaks at 95,000/90,000 read/write IOPS. Aggressive pricing is one of the factors that will make it an excellent option.Samsung Evo 860 – An IntroductionCheck on AmazonThe Samsung Evo 850 was indeed an excellent option and one of the superior SSDs that we have ever used. The successor, Samsung Evo 860 is also an attractive option and capably follows the footsteps of its predecessor.The Samsung Evo 860 comes with the 64-layer V-NAND technology. It makes use of the MJX SATA controller paired with 2GB of LPDDR4 DRAM to provide enhanced efficiency and performance. The SSD offers you the 560 megabytes per second (MB/s) and sequentially writes up to 520 MB/s. Endurance levels are another feature that makes it one of the excellent options to go with 1200 TBW.A Few Pros and Cons of all the three optionsWe thought instead of comparing the three drives based on the features and functionalities which remain almost equivalent and identical to each other; we will analyze the SSDs based on their Pros and Cons.Seagate BarracudaThe ProsAffordable pricing should appeal to the mass markets.The sequential read and write speeds are reasonable enough and ensure excellent performance.The specifications are almost conventional and meet virtually all the requirements.Thinner and lighter design makes it portable enough.The ConsThe SSD may not work effectively for highly random workloads or processing smaller files.There can be occasional issues in terms of performance.Crucial MX500The ProsA solid performer at an excellent value for consumer devicesAn aggressive and competitive pricingLonger endurance ratingHost power failure protectionThe ConsPerformance can be slightly slower than the competitorsThe design does not appear to be impressive enoughSamsung Evo 860The ProsSmaller footprint, but a good speed improvement over its predecessorsHighest ever endurance limitAn excellent overall performanceAn excellent software packageThe ConsIt comes with a SATA III interface which may appear to be a potential bottleneck.TRIM related performance issuesWorkload performances are a little mixed bag.Specifications Comparison: Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860Our head to head comparison between the features and specifications of the three competing options in the SSD sphere can be an excellent ready reckoner for comparing the features. It should give you more details before you choose your SSD.Features / particularsSeagate BarracudaCrucial MX500Samsung Evo 860Capacity available250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB and 4 TBInterfaceSATA 6 GB per secSATA 6 GB per secSATA 6Gb/sNAND Flash Memory3D TLCForm Factor2.5 in × 7mm2.5 in × 7mm and M.22.5 inch, mSATA, M.2Maximum Sequential Read speed560 MB per sec560 MB per sec550 MB per secMaximum Sequential write speed530 MB per sec for 250 GB535 MB per sec for 500 GB540 MB per sec for 1 and 2 TB510 MB per sec520 MB per secMaximum random read speed90000 IOPS95000 IOPS98000 IOPSMaximum random write speed90000 IOPS90000 IOPS90000 IOPSPhysical dimensions100 x 69.85 x 7 mmNA100 X 69.85 X 6.8 mm(29.85±0.15) x (50.80±0.15) x Max 3.85 (mSATA)Max 80.15 x 22.15 x 2.38 mm(M.2)Weight50 gramsNA250 GB, 500 GB: Max 50.0g1TB: Max 51.0g2TB: Max 60.0g4TB: Max 62.0gWarrantyFive yearsFive years Five YearsThe above chart shows that most of the features and functionalities that each of the competing options listed here have been almost equivalent as we have already stated in the above discussion. They can only be put to the real test only through the performance. The Pros and Cons specified for each of the SSDs in the above compilation should provide you the right kind of inputs on which among the above three should you go with.In essence, the reviews stand proof- we have observed that the Crucial MX500 and Samsung Evo 860 have been the fiercest competitors and Seagate understandably stays entirely away in the competition. Of course, Samsung Evo has been a clear leader even with the Evo 850 and continues to rule the roost even with the new Samsung Evo 860.So, which one among them have you used and which one would you want to suggest to us? Share your thoughts, experiences, and opinions with us. It can help us reach a wiser decision.Also Read:WD Black SN750 vs Samsung Evo 970QLC vs 3D Nand Flash SSD Storage EnduranceSamsung 970 Pro vs 970 Evo M.2 NVMe Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Share What's your reaction? Excited 0 Happy 0 In Love 0 Not Sure 1 Silly 0
Storage SystemsList of the Best 18 TB and 20TB Hard Disk Drives – External & Internal By IGJanuary 21, 2022
Storage SystemsCompare BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green SpecificationsThis article compares the BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green, which are entry-level SSDs that ...
PCCrucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500 Specifications ComparisonWith improvements in lithography and NAND densities, the SSDs have been getting considerably cheaper in ...
Storage SystemsList of the Best V30 SD Cards for 4K Video ProcessingIn this article, we have listed out the best V30 SD cards that are ideal ...
PCCompare Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo PlusThis post compares the Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo ...