Intel Arc B390 and AMD Radeon 8060S bring integrated graphics much closer to the performance and feature sets associated with dedicated GPUs. The Arc B390 uses Intel’s Xe3 architecture with XMX AI hardware, XeSS 3 upscaling and multi-frame generation, while the Radeon 8060S combines 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units with a 256-bit shared LPDDR5X memory interface.

Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.

This comparison puts the Intel Arc B390 and Radeon 8060S against the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 to show how current iGPUs compare with desktop graphics cards. It covers GPU architecture, compute hardware, memory bandwidth, power, 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, 4K capability, ray tracing, path tracing, XeSS, FSR, DLSS and frame generation.

You will also find lists of Core Ultra Series 3 and Ryzen AI Max processors that include these iGPUs, along with laptops, mini PCs and compact workstations using Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S. This makes it easier to compare the GPU itself and the systems you can actually buy or track in 2026.

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison | Faceofit.com

F Faceofit.com

PC hardware, mobile tech and buying comparisons

GPU comparison guide

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison

Intel Arc B390 and AMD Radeon 8060S sit at the top end of integrated graphics. This page compares them with Radeon RX 9070 XT and GeForce RTX 5090 across processor options, memory bandwidth, gaming, ray tracing and AI rendering features.

Updated January 2026 No pricing used Mobile responsive Interactive filters and charts

Quick read

Four GPUs, four different jobs

B390 has the richer current iGPU feature set. Radeon 8060S has much more raster hardware and memory bandwidth. RX 9070 XT is built for high refresh 1440p and 4K gaming. RTX 5090 has the highest RT, path tracing and memory ceiling in this group.

Intel iGPU Arc B390

12 Xe3 cores, XMX AI hardware, XeSS 3 and up to 4X output with supported multi-frame generation.

AMD iGPU Radeon 8060S

40 RDNA 3.5 CUs, 256-bit shared LPDDR5X and much higher raw raster throughput than a standard laptop iGPU.

AMD dGPU RX 9070 XT

64 RDNA 4 CUs, 16 GB GDDR6, 640 GB/s bandwidth and stronger RT hardware than RDNA 3.5.

NVIDIA dGPU RTX 5090

32 GB GDDR7, 1,792 GB/s bandwidth and the highest RT and path tracing performance in this comparison.

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison | Faceofit.com

F Faceofit.com

PC hardware, mobile tech and buying comparisons

GPU comparison guide

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison

Updated January 2026 No pricing used Mobile responsive Interactive filters and charts

Quick read

Four GPUs, four different jobs

Intel iGPU Arc B390

12 Xe3 cores, XMX AI hardware, XeSS 3 and up to 4X output with supported multi-frame generation.

AMD iGPU Radeon 8060S

40 RDNA 3.5 CUs, 256-bit shared LPDDR5X and much higher raw raster throughput than a standard laptop iGPU.

AMD dGPU RX 9070 XT

64 RDNA 4 CUs, 16 GB GDDR6, 640 GB/s bandwidth and stronger RT hardware than RDNA 3.5.

NVIDIA dGPU RTX 5090

32 GB GDDR7, 1,792 GB/s bandwidth and the highest RT and path tracing performance in this comparison.

Processor availability

Which processors include Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S?

The iGPU name alone does not identify the processor. These tables list the processor SKUs discussed in this guide, so buyers can check whether a laptop, mini PC or compact desktop uses the full B390 or 8060S graphics configuration.

Intel Xe3 Arc B390 processor list

These Core Ultra Series 3 processors use the full Arc B390 iGPU with 12 Xe3 cores. Lower Series 3 processors can use Arc B370 or smaller Intel Graphics configurations.

Processor	CPU cores	Max CPU boost	Cache	iGPU	GPU architecture	Launch
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H	16	4.8 GHz	18 MB	Arc B390	Xe3	Q1 2026
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H	16	5.0 GHz	18 MB	Arc B390	Xe3	Q1 2026
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H	16	5.0 GHz	18 MB	Arc B390	Xe3	Q1 2026
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H	16	5.1 GHz	18 MB	Arc B390	Xe3	Q1 2026

For a gaming-led B390 system, Core Ultra X7 358H is worth checking because it keeps the full B390 graphics configuration without requiring the top X9 CPU tier.

AMD RDNA 3.5 Radeon 8060S processor list

The Ryzen AI Max+ 388, 392 and 395 keep the full 40-CU Radeon 8060S. The CPU core count changes, but the graphics configuration remains at 40 CUs in these listed models.

Processor	CPU cores / threads	Max CPU boost	Cache	iGPU	GPU CUs	GPU clock	cTDP
Ryzen AI Max+ 388	8 / 16	5.0 GHz	40 MB	Radeon 8060S	40	2.9 GHz	45 to 120 W
Ryzen AI Max+ 392	12 / 24	5.0 GHz	76 MB	Radeon 8060S	40	2.9 GHz	45 to 120 W
Ryzen AI Max+ 395	16 / 32	5.1 GHz	80 MB	Radeon 8060S	40	about 2.9 GHz	45 to 120 W
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395	16 / 32	5.1 GHz	80 MB	Radeon 8060S	40	about 2.9 GHz	45 to 120 W

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is the gaming-focused value point in this list because it keeps all 40 graphics CUs while using fewer CPU cores than the 395.

Systems using these iGPUs

Laptops, mini PCs and compact workstations with Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S

As of 5 September 2026, there is a reasonably large set of shipping or announced systems using CPUs that carry Intel Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S. The AMD side has far more mini PCs, while Intel B390 appears in more conventional premium laptops.

Amazon search links Affiliate search links. Availability, seller and configuration can change. No fixed product pricing is shown on this page.

Check Intel Arc B390 on Amazon Check Intel Core Ultra Series 3 on Amazon Check AMD Radeon 8060S on Amazon Check AMD Ryzen AI Max on Amazon

Intel Arc B390 laptops

Laptop	B390 CPU configuration	Type and notes	Source
ASUS ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA	Core Ultra X7 358H	14-inch business ultraportable. ASUS India lists the X7 and B390 configuration through retail partners.	ASUS
ASUS Zenbook DUO UX8407	Core Ultra X9 388H	Dual 14-inch OLED. Full 12-Xe3 B390 configuration.	ASUS
Dell XPS 14 2026	Core Ultra X7 358H	Premium thin laptop. B390 configuration has been independently tested.	Notebookcheck
Dell XPS 16 2026	Core Ultra X7 358H, select X9 388H configs	Dell lists Arc graphics with the 358H and 388H configurations. Available through Dell India.	Dell
Framework Laptop 13 Pro	Core Ultra X7 358H or X9 388H	Upgradeable 13-inch system. Both B390 configurations have appeared in testing.	Phoronix
MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026	Core Ultra X7 358H	Convertible 14-inch system. B390 configuration has been independently tested.	Notebookcheck
MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG	Core Ultra X7 358H	16-inch productivity laptop. B390 appears in benchmark records and reviews.	Geekbench
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T	Up to Core Ultra X9 388H	Acer officially specifies up to Arc B390.	Acer
Acer Swift Go 16	Core Ultra X7 358H or X9 388H	B390 configurations reached selected Asian markets in September 2026.	Notebookcheck
Acer Aspire X 16 AI	Up to Core Ultra X9 388H	16-inch Copilot+ system, up to 12 Xe3 cores and B390.	Acer
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura Edition	Core Ultra X7 368H or X9 388H	Both CPU options explicitly use Arc B390.	Lenovo PSREF
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 9	Core Ultra X7 368H or X9 388H	Mobile workstation. B390 is available alongside optional RTX Pro GPUs.	Lenovo PSREF
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i 14 Gen 11, 14IPH11	Up to Core Ultra X9 388H	Top Panther Lake configuration carries B390.	Lenovo PSREF

Additional Panther Lake notebooks are covered in a current roundup that identifies the X7 and X9 300H plus B390 tier. Ultrabook Review Panther Lake roundup.

Intel Arc B390 mini PCs

The list is considerably shorter than the B390 laptop list.

Mini PC	CPU	Memory options and notes	Status	Source
ASUS NUC 16 Pro	Core Ultra X7 or X9, including X9 388H	Up to 96 GB LPDDR5X on X7 and X9 models	Official 2026 product	ASUS
Khadas Mind Pro	Core Ultra X7 358H or X9 388H	32 or 64 GB on X7, up to 96 GB on X9	Available	Khadas
Lenovo Yoga Mini 01IPH11, Yoga Mini i Gen 11	Core Ultra X7 358H	32 GB LPDDR5X in many markets	Official product	Lenovo PSREF
GPD BOX	Core Ultra X7 358H	32 or 64 GB LPDDR5X, MCIO and USB4 v2	Listed	GPD
NIMO Mini PC 388H 1L	Core Ultra X9 388H	Details still emerging	Coming soon as of September 2026	NIMO

B390 mini PC to watch Khadas Mind Pro X7 358H

Khadas allows the B390 to run in a relatively high-power implementation, and the X7 version has been independently tested. ASUS NUC 16 Pro is the more conventional business and mini-workstation option.

Notebookcheck Khadas Mind Pro review

AMD Radeon 8060S laptops

The 8060S appears with Ryzen AI Max+ 388, 392, 395 and Max+ PRO 395. AMD lists the 388 and 392 with the full 40-CU Radeon 8060S despite their lower CPU core counts than the 395.

Laptop	CPU	Memory and positioning	Source
ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401EA 2026	Ryzen AI Max+ 392	32 GB LPDDR5X. 14-inch 2.5K 165 Hz. Gaming-focused 8060S implementation.	ASUS
ASUS ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	32, 64 or 128 GB depending on configuration. Gaming tablet and laptop hybrid.	ASUS India
ASUS ProArt GoPro Edition PX13 HN7306	Ryzen AI Max+ 388 or 395, depending on configuration	32 GB with some 388 configs, up to 128 GB with 395. 13-inch creator convertible.	ASUS
HP ZBook Ultra G1a	Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395	Up to 128 GB unified memory. 14-inch mobile workstation.	HP
NIMO Axis AI Laptop	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	128 GB unified memory, up to 8 TB storage.	NIMO
Sixunited XN77-160M-CS	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB, 16-inch OLED. Availability outside China may be limited.	TechRadar

The ProArt PX13 with Max+ 388 is notable because the 388 retains all 40 Radeon 8060S CUs. Notebookcheck Radeon 8060S results.

Radeon 8060S mini PCs and compact workstations

This is the larger system category, with gaming-oriented mini PCs, modular desktops and local-AI workstations.

System	CPU	Memory	Current position	Source
GEEKOM A9 Mega	Max+ 388 or Max+ 395	64 GB or 128 GB	Available. One of the few 388 mini-PC choices. Both use 8060S.	GEEKOM
GMKtec EVO-X2	Max+ 395	64, 96 or 128 GB	Established 395 mini PC.	TechRadar
Framework Desktop	Max+ 395	64 or 128 GB	Compact modular desktop.	TechRadar
HP Z2 Mini G1a	Max+ PRO 395	Up to 128 GB	Mainstream workstation option.	HP
Beelink GTR9 Pro	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	Dual 10GbE, local-AI-focused design.	TechRadar
BOSGAME M5 AI	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	120 W-class implementation, dual USB4 and dual NVMe.	TechRadar
MINISFORUM MS-S1 Max	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	Compact workstation and server-style system. Independently benchmarked with 8060S.	Notebookcheck
Corsair AI Workstation 300	Max+ 395 option	High-capacity LPDDR5X	Compact local-AI workstation.	TechRadar
NIMO AI Mini PC 395, 2L	Max+ 395	128 GB	Currently listed by NIMO.	NIMO
NIMO AI Mini PC 395, 4L	Max+ 395	128 GB	Larger high-power NIMO version.	NIMO
Acer Veriton RA100 AI Mini Workstation	Max+ 395	High-capacity unified memory	Announced at CES 2026.	Acer
Acemagic Tank M1A Pro+	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	120 W-class 8060S implementation, already benchmarked.	TechRadar
FAVM FA-EX9	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	Around 2 L, includes OCuLink.	TechRadar
AOOSTAR NEX395	Max+ 395	Up to 128 GB	Listed in China, global availability may be limited.	TechRadar
LCFC AI Mini PC	Max+ 395	128 GB	Lenovo-affiliated LCFC system, primarily China.	TechRadar
MINIX Elite ER939-AI	Max+ 395	High-capacity LPDDR5X	Announced compact workstation.	TechRadar
PELADN YO1 395	Max+ 395	128 GB	Three power modes, up to 120 W.	TechRadar
Colorful Smart 900	Max+ 395	96 GB	Announced 8060S mini PC.	TechRadar

TechRadar had catalogued more than 30 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 systems by January 2026, including both shipping and announced machines. TechRadar Ryzen AI Max+ system roundup.

GEEKOM A9 Mega, Max+ 388 versus Max+ 395

A9 Mega	CPU	CPU cores	iGPU	RAM
Lower configuration	Ryzen AI Max+ 388	8C / 16T	Radeon 8060S, 40 CU	64 GB
Higher configuration	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	16C / 32T	Radeon 8060S, 40 CU	128 GB

Dropping from the Max+ 395 to the Max+ 388 does not reduce the Radeon 8060S CU count. AMD specifies 40 CUs and a 2.9 GHz graphics frequency for the 388. For a machine bought mainly for gaming, the 388 or 392 can make more sense when GPU power limits and memory bandwidth are similar.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 specifications · GEEKOM A9 Mega

System shortlist

B390 laptop gamingStart with Acer Swift 16 AI

Also compare MSI Prestige 16 AI+, ASUS Zenbook DUO and ThinkPad X9-15p.

B390 mini PCKhadas Mind Pro

ASUS NUC 16 Pro is the more conventional business and compact-workstation option.

8060S laptopASUS TUF Gaming A14

The Max+ 392 version is aimed directly at gaming. ROG Flow Z13 offers Max+ 395 in a 2-in-1 format.

8060S mini PCGEEKOM A9 Mega

Also compare GMKtec EVO-X2, Framework Desktop, MINISFORUM MS-S1 Max and HP Z2 Mini G1a.

Core specifications

Hardware comparison

Use the filters to hide GPUs you do not want to compare. The same filter selection also changes the interactive chart farther down the page.

Specification	Intel Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
GPU type	Integrated	Integrated	Desktop dGPU	Desktop dGPU
Architecture	Xe3	RDNA 3.5	RDNA 4	Blackwell
Compute configuration	12 Xe cores	40 CUs	64 CUs, 4,096 SP	170 SM, 21,760 CUDA cores
RT hardware	12 RT units	40 RT accelerators	64 RT accelerators	170 RT cores
AI hardware	XMX	RDNA AI acceleration	128 AI accelerators	680 Tensor cores
Peak FP32	about 7.7 TFLOPS	about 14.9 to 29.7 TFLOPS, depending on counting method	48.7 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS
Vendor AI figure	122 INT8 TOPS	Not directly comparable	389 INT8 TOPS, 779 sparse	3,352 AI TOPS
Memory	Shared LPDDR5X	Shared LPDDR5X	16 GB GDDR6	32 GB GDDR7
Memory interface	128-bit LPDDR5X-9600	256-bit LPDDR5X-8000	256-bit, 20 Gbps	512-bit, 28 Gbps
Peak bandwidth	about 153.6 GB/s shared	256 GB/s shared	640 GB/s	1,792 GB/s
Power envelope	about 38 to 40 W GPU at full performance	55 W default SoC, up to 120 W configurable	304 W TBP	575 W TGP
Rendering suite	XeSS 3	FSR 3.x, AFMF 2.1	FSR Redstone	DLSS 4.5 and later RTX 50 features referenced in this comparison

TFLOPS and TOPS are architecture-specific figures. RDNA 3.5 dual-issue accounting can produce a much larger FP32 headline number for 8060S than conventional single-issue counting.

Memory subsystem

Bandwidth changes the picture at 1440p, 4K and RT

Both iGPUs share memory bandwidth with the CPU and other SoC blocks. The desktop cards use dedicated graphics memory, so more of their bandwidth is available to the GPU workload.

Arc B390

154 GB/s

Radeon 8060S

256 GB/s

RX 9070 XT

640 GB/s

RTX 5090

1,792 GB/s

5090 vs B39011.7×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

5090 vs 8060S7×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

5090 vs 9070 XT2.8×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

Real game targets

Where each GPU fits by resolution

Cyberpunk 2077 native-resolution figures show the broad spacing between the iGPUs and desktop GPUs. These are directional because the systems, CPUs and power limits differ.

Cyberpunk 2077 native	Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
1080p Ultra	about 45 to 48 FPS	about 87 to 90 FPS	about 188 FPS	about 185 FPS
1440p Ultra	about 28 FPS	about 54 FPS	about 134 FPS	about 182 FPS
4K Ultra	Not practical	about 22 FPS	about 63 FPS	about 112 FPS
Best native target	1080p	1080p and 1440p	1440p and 4K	4K

Arc B3901080p

Medium to high settings are the main target. XeSS can help at higher settings or with RT.

Radeon 8060S1080p to 1440p

1080p Ultra and 1440p High are realistic in many games when package power is available.

RX 9070 XT1440p to 4K

High refresh 1440p and 4K raster are the main use cases.

RTX 50904K

4K raster, heavy RT and path tracing are its main gaming targets.

Desktop GPU normalized game-suite view

This table compares the two desktop cards using the same broader game-suite view from the original report.

Game-suite average	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090	RTX 5090 advantage
1080p Ultra raster	156.6 FPS	203.8 FPS	about 30%
1440p Ultra raster	116.5 FPS	167.3 FPS	about 44%
4K Ultra raster	65.8 FPS	110.8 FPS	about 68%
1080p Ultra RT	77.8 FPS	125.7 FPS	about 62%
1440p Ultra RT	55.5 FPS	100.8 FPS	about 82%
4K Ultra RT	30.1 FPS	64.1 FPS	about 113%

At 1080p, very fast desktop GPUs can become CPU limited. The gap grows at 1440p, 4K and RT because the GPU workload becomes the larger limit.

Ray tracing

RT separates the iGPUs from the desktop cards

A heavy RT workload exposes the gap in RT hardware, memory bandwidth and total power. Speed Way figures below are approximate.

Arc B390

~932

Light 1080p RT
Use XeSS in demanding titles
Heavy path tracing is not a practical target

Radeon 8060S

~1,933

Light to medium 1080p RT
Some 1440p light RT
Upscaling is useful

RX 9070 XT

~6,370

1440p high RT
4K RT with upscaling and FG
RDNA 4 RT hardware

RTX 5090

~14,570

4K high RT
Best path tracing result here
Ray Reconstruction support

Rendering features

Upscaling, frame generation and low latency

Feature coverage and raw performance are separate issues. B390 is a good example because its XeSS feature list is strong even though its base render rate is much lower than a high-end desktop GPU.

GeForce RTX 5090

DLSS Super Resolution→ Ray Reconstruction→ Multi Frame Generation→ Reflex

Radeon RX 9070 XT

FSR ML Upscaling→ Ray Regeneration→ ML Frame Generation→ Anti-Lag

Intel Arc B390

XeSS Super Resolution→ XeSS Multi Frame Generation→ XeLL

Radeon 8060S

FSR 3.x Upscaling→ FSR 3 FG or AFMF 2.1→ Anti-Lag

Generated frames can improve visible motion smoothness, but the base rendered frame rate still determines much of the latency, simulation response and the amount of newly rendered information.

At a glance

Capability scorecard

These ratings summarize the practical use cases from the original comparison. They are qualitative, not benchmark scores.

Category	Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
1080p raster	3 / 5	4.5 / 5	5 / 5	5 / 5
1440p raster	2 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5	5 / 5
4K raster	1 / 5	2 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5
Ray tracing	2 / 5	2.5 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5
Path tracing	1 / 5	1.5 / 5	3 / 5	5 / 5
AI rendering features	4.5 / 5	3 / 5	4.5 / 5	5 / 5
Performance per watt	Excellent	Very good	Good	Low
Memory model	Shared system memory	Large shared system memory pool	16 GB dedicated VRAM	32 GB dedicated VRAM

Interactive chart

Switch between bandwidth, 1440p gaming and RT

Use the buttons below to change the metric. GPU checkboxes in the hardware section also control what appears in this chart.

Reading the numbers

Caveats that matter for iGPU comparisons

System power The same iGPU can perform differently

Arc B390 and Radeon 8060S results depend on package power, memory speed, cooling, firmware and OEM settings. A low-power system can be materially slower than a fully powered one.

Shared memory Peak bandwidth is shared

The CPU and other SoC blocks also use the LPDDR memory fabric. Peak bandwidth is not reserved for the iGPU in the same way dedicated VRAM bandwidth is reserved for a desktop GPU.

TFLOPS and TOPS Cross-vendor numbers need context

Precision, sparsity, execution layout and dual-issue behavior differ by architecture. Headline compute figures are better used inside the same architecture family than as a direct cross-vendor ranking.

Frame generation Displayed FPS is not base FPS

Generated frames can make motion look smoother, but they do not raise the underlying simulation rate or create the same latency profile as rendering every frame natively.

Template formats

Three ways to read the comparison

Different readers need different amounts of detail. These page formats keep the same data but present it for different decisions.

Format 1 Quick spec table

Use the hardware table when architecture, memory, bandwidth and power are the main filters.

Open hardware view

Format 2 Resolution guide

Use the gaming and RT sections when the decision is based on 1080p, 1440p, 4K or ray tracing.

Open gaming view

Format 3 Feature flow

Use the AI feature section when comparing upscaling, frame generation, RT reconstruction and low-latency tools.

Open feature view

FAQ

Questions buyers ask about B390 and 8060S

Which iGPU is faster, Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S?

Radeon 8060S has much more raw raster hardware and a wider shared-memory interface. In demanding games, a fully powered 8060S can be close to twice as fast as B390 in some workloads.

Which iGPU has the stronger current AI gaming feature list?

Arc B390 has the stronger feature list in this comparison because XeSS 3 includes AI upscaling, frame generation, multi-frame generation and XeLL on supported games.

Does Radeon 8060S support the full RDNA 4 FSR Redstone feature set?

No. Radeon 8060S is RDNA 3.5. It can use FSR 3.x features and AFMF 2.1, but the full RDNA 4 path shown here belongs to newer discrete Radeon hardware.

Can B390 or 8060S replace RX 9070 XT for 4K gaming?

No. The dedicated RX 9070 XT has far more graphics throughput and 640 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth. It is built for 1440p and 4K gaming in a way these iGPUs are not.

Why does RTX 5090 pull farther ahead when ray tracing is enabled?

RT performance depends on RT hardware, compute throughput, memory bandwidth and the rendering stack. RTX 5090 has much more of each than the iGPUs, and it also supports Ray Reconstruction in compatible games.

Does multi-frame generation make B390 equal to a GPU that renders the same FPS natively?

No. A high displayed FPS from generated frames does not create the same base simulation rate or input latency as rendering every frame natively.

What should I check before buying a laptop or mini PC with one of these iGPUs?

Check the exact processor SKU, memory speed, package power limit, cooling design and whether the device uses the full B390 or 8060S graphics configuration. iGPU performance can move a lot between systems using the same processor family.

Faceofit.com buying note

Choose by workload, not by the feature checklist alone

Arc B390 suits thin systems where XeSS features matter and 1080p is the main target. Radeon 8060S is the stronger iGPU when raster speed and a large shared-memory pool matter. RX 9070 XT is the step up for 1440p and 4K. RTX 5090 sits at the top for 4K RT, path tracing and memory bandwidth.

Core specifications

Hardware comparison

Use the filters to hide GPUs you do not want to compare. The same filter selection also changes the interactive chart farther down the page.

Specification	Intel Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
GPU type	Integrated	Integrated	Desktop dGPU	Desktop dGPU
Architecture	Xe3	RDNA 3.5	RDNA 4	Blackwell
Compute configuration	12 Xe cores	40 CUs	64 CUs, 4,096 SP	170 SM, 21,760 CUDA cores
RT hardware	12 RT units	40 RT accelerators	64 RT accelerators	170 RT cores
AI hardware	XMX	RDNA AI acceleration	128 AI accelerators	680 Tensor cores
Peak FP32	about 7.7 TFLOPS	about 14.9 to 29.7 TFLOPS, depending on counting method	48.7 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS
Vendor AI figure	122 INT8 TOPS	Not directly comparable	389 INT8 TOPS, 779 sparse	3,352 AI TOPS
Memory	Shared LPDDR5X	Shared LPDDR5X	16 GB GDDR6	32 GB GDDR7
Memory interface	128-bit LPDDR5X-9600	256-bit LPDDR5X-8000	256-bit, 20 Gbps	512-bit, 28 Gbps
Peak bandwidth	about 153.6 GB/s shared	256 GB/s shared	640 GB/s	1,792 GB/s
Power envelope	about 38 to 40 W GPU at full performance	55 W default SoC, up to 120 W configurable	304 W TBP	575 W TGP
Rendering suite	XeSS 3	FSR 3.x, AFMF 2.1	FSR Redstone	DLSS 4.5 and later RTX 50 features referenced in this comparison

TFLOPS and TOPS are architecture-specific figures. RDNA 3.5 dual-issue accounting can produce a much larger FP32 headline number for 8060S than conventional single-issue counting.

Memory subsystem

Bandwidth changes the picture at 1440p, 4K and RT

Both iGPUs share memory bandwidth with the CPU and other SoC blocks. The desktop cards use dedicated graphics memory, so more of their bandwidth is available to the GPU workload.

Arc B390

154 GB/s

Radeon 8060S

256 GB/s

RX 9070 XT

640 GB/s

RTX 5090

1,792 GB/s

5090 vs B39011.7×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

5090 vs 8060S7×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

5090 vs 9070 XT2.8×

Approximate peak bandwidth ratio.

Real game targets

Where each GPU fits by resolution

Cyberpunk 2077 native-resolution figures show the broad spacing between the iGPUs and desktop GPUs. These are directional because the systems, CPUs and power limits differ.

Cyberpunk 2077 native	Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
1080p Ultra	about 45 to 48 FPS	about 87 to 90 FPS	about 188 FPS	about 185 FPS
1440p Ultra	about 28 FPS	about 54 FPS	about 134 FPS	about 182 FPS
4K Ultra	Not practical	about 22 FPS	about 63 FPS	about 112 FPS
Best native target	1080p	1080p and 1440p	1440p and 4K	4K

Arc B3901080p

Medium to high settings are the main target. XeSS can help at higher settings or with RT.

Radeon 8060S1080p to 1440p

1080p Ultra and 1440p High are realistic in many games when package power is available.

RX 9070 XT1440p to 4K

High refresh 1440p and 4K raster are the main use cases.

RTX 50904K

4K raster, heavy RT and path tracing are its main gaming targets.

Desktop GPU normalized game-suite view

This table compares the two desktop cards using the same broader game-suite view from the original report.

Game-suite average	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090	RTX 5090 advantage
1080p Ultra raster	156.6 FPS	203.8 FPS	about 30%
1440p Ultra raster	116.5 FPS	167.3 FPS	about 44%
4K Ultra raster	65.8 FPS	110.8 FPS	about 68%
1080p Ultra RT	77.8 FPS	125.7 FPS	about 62%
1440p Ultra RT	55.5 FPS	100.8 FPS	about 82%
4K Ultra RT	30.1 FPS	64.1 FPS	about 113%

At 1080p, very fast desktop GPUs can become CPU limited. The gap grows at 1440p, 4K and RT because the GPU workload becomes the larger limit.

Ray tracing

RT separates the iGPUs from the desktop cards

A heavy RT workload exposes the gap in RT hardware, memory bandwidth and total power. Speed Way figures below are approximate.

Arc B390

~932

Light 1080p RT
Use XeSS in demanding titles
Heavy path tracing is not a practical target

Radeon 8060S

~1,933

Light to medium 1080p RT
Some 1440p light RT
Upscaling is useful

RX 9070 XT

~6,370

1440p high RT
4K RT with upscaling and FG
RDNA 4 RT hardware

RTX 5090

~14,570

4K high RT
Best path tracing result here
Ray Reconstruction support

Rendering features

Upscaling, frame generation and low latency

Feature coverage and raw performance are separate issues. B390 is a good example because its XeSS feature list is strong even though its base render rate is much lower than a high-end desktop GPU.

GeForce RTX 5090

DLSS Super Resolution→ Ray Reconstruction→ Multi Frame Generation→ Reflex

Radeon RX 9070 XT

FSR ML Upscaling→ Ray Regeneration→ ML Frame Generation→ Anti-Lag

Intel Arc B390

XeSS Super Resolution→ XeSS Multi Frame Generation→ XeLL

Radeon 8060S

FSR 3.x Upscaling→ FSR 3 FG or AFMF 2.1→ Anti-Lag

Generated frames can improve visible motion smoothness, but the base rendered frame rate still determines much of the latency, simulation response and the amount of newly rendered information.

At a glance

Capability scorecard

These ratings summarize the practical use cases from the original comparison. They are qualitative, not benchmark scores.

Category	Arc B390	Radeon 8060S	RX 9070 XT	RTX 5090
1080p raster	3 / 5	4.5 / 5	5 / 5	5 / 5
1440p raster	2 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5	5 / 5
4K raster	1 / 5	2 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5
Ray tracing	2 / 5	2.5 / 5	4 / 5	5 / 5
Path tracing	1 / 5	1.5 / 5	3 / 5	5 / 5
AI rendering features	4.5 / 5	3 / 5	4.5 / 5	5 / 5
Performance per watt	Excellent	Very good	Good	Low
Memory model	Shared system memory	Large shared system memory pool	16 GB dedicated VRAM	32 GB dedicated VRAM

Interactive chart

Switch between bandwidth, 1440p gaming and RT

Use the buttons below to change the metric. GPU checkboxes in the hardware section also control what appears in this chart.

Reading the numbers

Caveats that matter for iGPU comparisons

System power The same iGPU can perform differently

Arc B390 and Radeon 8060S results depend on package power, memory speed, cooling, firmware and OEM settings. A low-power system can be materially slower than a fully powered one.

Shared memory Peak bandwidth is shared

The CPU and other SoC blocks also use the LPDDR memory fabric. Peak bandwidth is not reserved for the iGPU in the same way dedicated VRAM bandwidth is reserved for a desktop GPU.

TFLOPS and TOPS Cross-vendor numbers need context

Frame generation Displayed FPS is not base FPS

Generated frames can make motion look smoother, but they do not raise the underlying simulation rate or create the same latency profile as rendering every frame natively.

Template formats

Three ways to read the comparison

Different readers need different amounts of detail. These page formats keep the same data but present it for different decisions.

Format 1 Quick spec table

Use the hardware table when architecture, memory, bandwidth and power are the main filters.

Open hardware view

Format 2 Resolution guide

Use the gaming and RT sections when the decision is based on 1080p, 1440p, 4K or ray tracing.

Open gaming view

Format 3 Feature flow

Use the AI feature section when comparing upscaling, frame generation, RT reconstruction and low-latency tools.

Open feature view

FAQ

Questions buyers ask about B390 and 8060S

Which iGPU is faster, Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S?

Radeon 8060S has much more raw raster hardware and a wider shared-memory interface. In demanding games, a fully powered 8060S can be close to twice as fast as B390 in some workloads.

Which iGPU has the stronger current AI gaming feature list?

Arc B390 has the stronger feature list in this comparison because XeSS 3 includes AI upscaling, frame generation, multi-frame generation and XeLL on supported games.

Does Radeon 8060S support the full RDNA 4 FSR Redstone feature set?

No. Radeon 8060S is RDNA 3.5. It can use FSR 3.x features and AFMF 2.1, but the full RDNA 4 path shown here belongs to newer discrete Radeon hardware.

Can B390 or 8060S replace RX 9070 XT for 4K gaming?

No. The dedicated RX 9070 XT has far more graphics throughput and 640 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth. It is built for 1440p and 4K gaming in a way these iGPUs are not.

Why does RTX 5090 pull farther ahead when ray tracing is enabled?

Does multi-frame generation make B390 equal to a GPU that renders the same FPS natively?

No. A high displayed FPS from generated frames does not create the same base simulation rate or input latency as rendering every frame natively.

What should I check before buying a laptop or mini PC with one of these iGPUs?

Faceofit.com buying note

Choose by workload, not by the feature checklist alone

Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

What's your reaction?

Excited

Happy

In Love

Not Sure

Silly

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison

Four GPUs, four different jobs

iGPUs vs Discrete GPUs Comparison

Four GPUs, four different jobs

Which processors include Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S?

Laptops, mini PCs and compact workstations with Arc B390 or Radeon 8060S

Intel Arc B390 laptops

Intel Arc B390 mini PCs

AMD Radeon 8060S laptops

Radeon 8060S mini PCs and compact workstations

GEEKOM A9 Mega, Max+ 388 versus Max+ 395

System shortlist

Hardware comparison

Bandwidth changes the picture at 1440p, 4K and RT

Where each GPU fits by resolution

Desktop GPU normalized game-suite view

RT separates the iGPUs from the desktop cards

Upscaling, frame generation and low latency

Capability scorecard

Switch between bandwidth, 1440p gaming and RT

Caveats that matter for iGPU comparisons

Three ways to read the comparison

Questions buyers ask about B390 and 8060S

Choose by workload, not by the feature checklist alone

Hardware comparison

Bandwidth changes the picture at 1440p, 4K and RT

Where each GPU fits by resolution

Desktop GPU normalized game-suite view

RT separates the iGPUs from the desktop cards

Upscaling, frame generation and low latency

Capability scorecard

Switch between bandwidth, 1440p gaming and RT

Caveats that matter for iGPU comparisons

Three ways to read the comparison

Questions buyers ask about B390 and 8060S

Choose by workload, not by the feature checklist alone

Share

What's your reaction?

You may also like

More in:PC

Latest Posts

Popular Tags