Storage SystemsTech Posts Compare Samsung 860 QVO vs EVO vs Crucial MX500 vs WD Blue SATA SSD 4106 views0 Share By Share If you are looking to compare the Samsung 860 QVO vs EVO vs Crucial MX500 vs WD Blue SATA SSD then you are in the right place. Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement. Affordable SSDs have been replacing the traditional hard drives in many markets. If you are looking to replace your existing SSDs or checking out the options for the best SSDs to replace your aging Hard drives, choosing the right one may not come as easy as you would expect. To ease you of the trouble of finding the best SSD with a perfect performance, we thought of comparing four mid-range options in the SSD sphere – Samsung 860 QVO, Samsung 860 Evo, Crucial MX500, and WD Blue. How do the SSDs compare against one another? Let us have a concise review of each of them for a better understanding. Table of Contents Toggle Samsung 860 QVO – An OverviewProsConsSamsung 860 EVO – What does it offer?ProsConsCrucial MX500 – A Sneak PeekProsConsWD Blue – A Concise ReviewProsConsThe Comparison Table: Samsung 860 QVO vs EVO vs Crucial MX500 vs WD BlueThe Concluding ThoughtsMore Reading: Samsung 860 QVO – An Overview Check on Amazon The QVO 860 is the latest entrant among the 860 series SSD family. It comes with the JMX controller and a 64-layer 3D V-NAND flash memory. You can have access to it in three different storage Tiers – 1 TB, 2 TB, and 4 TB. If you are looking for the best performance and capacity at an affordable price tag, it should be an excellent option in itself. It is a 2.5-inch, 7mm thick, SATA 6Gbps SSD. You get 1 GB DRAM for the 1 TB capacity. It comes with an SLC NAND cell construction. It would offer you a better and faster writing performance. If you are a mainstream user, it should be the best you would get access to. Pros Excellent affordability High-end capacity to up to 4 TB Extremely thinner construction Cons Write speed is not sustainable in some cases. The secondary cache can get exhausted when using for heavy applications or buffer overflows. Samsung 860 EVO – What does it offer? Check on Amazon The Evo series has been undeniably the best option when it comes to SSDs. It has been a widely popular SSDs in recent times. When you compare it to the more expensive 860 Pro series, you will find it extremely affordable. It features the same JMX controller and 64-layer 3D V-NAND flash memory from Samsung. The SSD provides you access to a sequential read speed of 550 MB per sec and a sequential write speed of 520 MB per sec. The drive comes with capacities as high as 4 TB. The design language remains the same as in the previous versions. The new drive comes with a bump in terms of performance and a better endurance level. The TurboWrite functionality would be yet another huge advantage that the trip has an offer to enhance the performance level further. Pros A substantial endurance level. An excellent performance Can be an excellent option for use with smaller queued writes Cons Durability may be a little downward Slightly expensive Crucial MX500 – A Sneak Peek Check on Amazon Crucial MX500 has been one of the excellent mid-range options for entry-level gaming performance. It adds up a substantial hardware addition to the already powerful and popular choices from the flagship line of SSDs. The SSD is equipped with Micron’s new 64-layer 3D TLC NAND memory. For a change, you will find it offering a SATA SSD performance. The drive is available in four different capacities that include 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB. It provides you a 560MB/sec sequential read and 510MB/sec sequential write speeds. The random rates will read 95K IOPS read and 90K IOPS write speeds. The impressive five-year warranty and aggressive pricing should ideally keep it at the top end for most of your needs in a power-packed performance. Pros Faster performance Highly competitive pricing Solid all-round performance Cons A slower SATA interface when compared to the other PCIe counterparts. Lower endurance rating. WD Blue – A Concise Review Check on Amazon The WD Blue is the first SATA SSD coming from the house of Western Digital in the consumer-grade realm. If you have been a WD fan and have been using their hard drives so far, this is a great budget pick. However, the cost would be something that you would find not impressive when you compare them to the other similar options from other manufacturers. If you are searching for low-cost options, it may not be the right one you would be looking for. The drive is available in three variants of 250 GB to 1 TB. It is made possible in both 2.5″ and M.2 2280 (AHCI SATA) configurations. The peak performances would be 545 MB/s sequential read and 525 MB/s of sequential write speed, while the random rates read 100,000/80,000 read/write IOPS. The drive is based on the Marvell 88SS1074 “Dean” 4-channel controller. It is powered by the 15nm 3-bit per cell (TLC) NAND. The endurance limits appear to be slightly lower. You have access to a three-year warranty on the product. Pros Competitive write speeds The software is indeed the best among the competition A decent TBW rating Cons Cost is quite heavy Warranty is shorter enough The Comparison Table: Samsung 860 QVO vs EVO vs Crucial MX500 vs WD Blue Having checked out the features offered by each of the drives and how do they fare against one another, we thought a head-to-head comparison should help you arrive at the best understanding of the four discs. Features Samsung 860 QVO Check on Amazon Samsung 860 EVO Check on Amazon Crucial MX500 Check on Amazon WD Blue Check on Amazon Form factor 2.5 inch 2.5 inch, mSATA, and M.2 2.5 inch and M.2 2.5”, M.2 2280 Capacities available 1 TB, 2 TB and 4 TB 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB and 4 TB 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB 250GB, 500GB, 1TB Sequential Read Speed 550 MB per sec 550 MB per sec 560 MB per sec 250 GB – 540 MB per sec 500 GB and 1 TB – 545 MB per sec Sequential Write speed 520 MB Per sec 520 MB Per sec 510 MB per sec 250 GB – 500 MB per sec 500 GB and 1 TB – 525 MB per sec Interface SATA III 6 Gb per sec SATA III 6 Gb per sec SATA III 6 Gb per sec SATA III 6 Gb per sec Physical dimensions 100 X 69.85 X 6.8 (mm) 100 X 69.85 X 6.8 (mm) 3.15″ x 0.87″ x 0.09″ Weight 1 TB – 51 grams 2 TB – 60 grams 4 TB – 62 grams 250 GB, 500 GB: Max 50.0g 1TB: Max 51.0g 2TB: Max 60.0g 4TB: Max 62.0g 6.5 grams Storage memory Samsung V-NAND 4bit MLC Samsung V-NAND 3bit MLC Micron 256Gb 64-layer 3D TLC 15nm 3-bit per cell (TLC) NAND Controller JMX controller JMX controller Silicon Motion SM2258 Marvell 88SS1074 “Dean” 4-channel controller Encryption support AES 256-bit Encryption (Class 0) TCG/Opal IEEE1667 (Encrypted drive) AES 256-bit Encryption (Class 0) TCG/Opal IEEE1667 (Encrypted drive) TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive) NA Random Read Speed 1 TB – 96000 IOPS 2 TB – 97000 IOPS 4 TB – 97000 IOPS 98000 IOPS 95000 IOPS 250 GB – 97000 IOPS 500 GB and 1 TB – 100000 IOPS Random Write speed 42000 IOPS 42000 IOPS 90000 IOPS 250 GB – 79000 IOPS 500 GB and 1 TB – 80000 IOPS Reliability 1.5 Million Hours Reliability 1.5 Million Hours Reliability 1.8 million hours 1.75 million hours Power Consumption 1 TB: Average 2.2 W Maximum 4.0 W 2 TB: Average 3.1 W Maximum 4.2 W 4 TB: Average 3.1 W Maximum 5.4 W 250 GB: Average 2.2 W Maximum 4.0 W 500 GB: Average 2.5 W Maximum 4.0 W 1,000 GB: Average 3.0 W Maximum 4.0 W 2,000 GB: Average 3.0 W Maximum 4.0 W 4,000 GB: Average 3.0 W Maximum 4.0 W 5.0 W 3.5 W for 250 GB 3.9 W for 500 GB 4.9 W for 1 TB Warranty 1 TB – 3 Years or 360 TBW 2 TB – 3 Years or 720 TBW 4 TB – 3 Years or 1,440 TBW 250 GB – 5 Years or 150 TBW 500 GB – 5 Years or 300 TBW 1 TB – 5 Years or 600 TBW 2 TB – 5 Year or 1,200 TBW 4 TB – 5 Year or 2,400 TBW Five years Three years The Concluding Thoughts That was a complete comparison between the best options for the SSDs for your budget-oriented computer or laptop. Check out the comparison above and choose the best option that meets your exact needs. Except for the WD Blue, which may be a costly option when compared to the competing drives currently available, the other three options should be one of the excellent alternatives. Check out those specifications above and reach the right choice for your needs. More Reading: Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860 Kingston A400 vs Q500 vs KC600 Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400 Specifications Comparison Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo Plus Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Share What's your reaction? Excited 0 Happy 1 In Love 1 Not Sure 0 Silly 0
PC Seagate Exos X vs WD Ultrastar vs Ironwolf Pro – Specs Comparison Hyperscale cloud, CSPs, enterprises, intelligent video surveillance systems, NAS suppliers, and more need storage solutions ...
Storage Systems List of the Best 18 TB and 20TB Hard Disk Drives – External & Internal When you want to create a backup of data, a hard drive comes in handy. ...
Storage Systems Compare BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green Specifications This article compares the BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green, which are entry-level SSDs that ...
PC Crucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500 Specifications Comparison With improvements in lithography and NAND densities, the SSDs have been getting considerably cheaper in ...