Storage SystemsQLC vs TLC NAND SSD Disks Specifications Comparison & Differences March 9, 20197856 views0Share By IG ShareIn this article, we help you to understand better how QLC vs TLC NAND differs from each other.If you have basic knowledge about computer storage components, you might very well know how a hard disk drive differs from a solid state drive or SSD. Even if you don’t know many technical details, you may at least know that SSDs are far more superior compared to HDDs when it comes to speed and performance in accessing the stored data. The use of SSDs is increasing day by day in the latest devices. However, given to the expensive price tags on SSDs, you will find hybrid storage used by most of the people with limited budgets. Today at Face of IT, we will be discussing various types of SSDs available in the market.If you are looking for an SSD storage solution for your system, you might have come across some of the products which offer the same storage capacity but possess a significant difference in price tag. This is because their internal architecture is different, regardless of what capacity they offer.Related: Best PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD DrivesTable of Contents SSD cell architecture:Nand Flash Memory:QLC vs TLC Nand:1. TLC Nand – Triple Level Cell:Best TLC Nand Storage:1. HP EX920 M.2 1 TB:2. Kingston A1000 960 GB:3. Intel SSD 600p 1 TB:2. QLC Nand – Quad Level Cell:Best QLC Nand Storage:1. Intel SSD 660p 1 TB:2. Crucial P1 1 TB:Conclusion:SSD cell architecture:Including QLC, there is a total of four types/architectures or SSDs used widely so far:Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.SLC – single-level cellMLC – multi-level cellTLC – triple-level cellQLC – Quad levelHowever, our computing demand in terms of both performance/speed and capacity is increasing very rapidly. Thus, QLC, a new type of flash memory had to be invented. This new type, Quad level cell allows SSDs to provide more massive capacity storage while keeping the price low. Before we discuss TLC and QLC types and go through various products available in each category, here is a quick introduction to NAND flash memory.Nand Flash Memory:Compared to conventional hard disk drives, Nand flash storage offers better, faster and cheaper media storage solutions. It is a non-volatile memory which saves data even when power is cut of mid operations. Nand flash storage is a collection of cells, which hold multiple bits. Electrical charge is used to turn these bits on and off. The organizational structure of these cells represents how SSD will store the data. For example, Single level cell or SLC holds a single bit in each cell. Same goes for MLC(double bits) and TLC(triple bits) per cell. QLC is a result of the manufacturer’s efforts towards utilizing each cell at fullest to provide faster storage solutions at cheaper costs. QLC provides 4 bits in each cell.Also Read: Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860QLC vs TLC Nand:The anatomy of these NAND storage types is not that simple; as they possess their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages. In this section, we will discuss more TLC and QLC NAND flash storage, and address some of the best products available in this particular category. So you can choose a suitable SSD according to your requirements.FeaturesTLC NANDQLC NANDReads & Write Cycle500-10001000Bits/Cell34Performance2/52/5Power Consumption0.458 W (Kingston A1000)0.100 W (Intel 660p)$ per GB$0.2 – $0.18$0.12 – $0.18AdvantagesLow CostMore Storage CapacityTarget MarketConsumer SSDsHigh-Density Data Storage1. TLC Nand – Triple Level Cell:As mentioned above, in the TLC structure, each cell holds 3 bits of data. As far as manufacturing cost is concerned, this type of flash memory is the cheapest to produce. However, the biggest bottleneck with this type of storage is that it is suitable for consumer level use only as it does not meet the requirements and standards required for industrial or enterprise use. Its read & write cycles are as well shorter. It ranges between 3000 to 5000 cycles per cell.Overview:AdvantagesLower production costCheapest SSDs available in the marketLimitationsShorter life span compared to SLC, MLCRecommend ApplicationsEveryday ConsumerWeb PortalsEmail MachinesNotebooks, TabletsBest TLC Nand Storage:Following are some of the best TLC Nand storage devices available our there:1. HP EX920 M.2 1 TB:Check on AmazonFeatures Highlight: High performance at lower power consumptionHigh reliability and system responsivenessCompact form factor with minimal weightExtensive ruggednessImproved data integrity and data securityGeneral: ManufacturerHPSeries / ModelEX920 / 2YY47AA#ABCStorage Type Internal Solid State DriveForm FactorM.2 2280Capacity1 TBMemory Component3D TLCInterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Controller HPCache1 GBPerformance: Sequential Read / Write 3200 MB/s – read1800 MB/s – write4 KB Random 350000 IOPS – read250000 IOPS – writeLatency0.020 ms read latency0.022 ms write latencyMTBF2000000 hoursEnvironmental: Power Consumption0.73 W (Idle)6.23 W (Active)Temperature0 to +78 C – Operating-40 to +85 C – StorageHumidity5 – 95 %Shock Resistance100 G / 6 msecVibration Resistance3.1 GRMS (2-500 Hz)Dimension / Weight: Dimension3.80 x 22 x 80 mmWeight5.40 g2. Kingston A1000 960 GB:Check on AmazonFeatures Highlight: Up to 20 times better performance compared to conventional HDD, perfect for upgrading older systems2 2280 form factor with multi-purpose SFF connectorIdeal single sided and compact design for thin and light notebooks and systems with limited spaceAvailable in multiple capacities and price rangeGeneral: ManufacturerKingstonSeries / ModelA1000 / SA1000M8/960GStorage Type Internal Solid State DriveForm FactorM.2 2280Capacity960 GBMemory Component3D TLCInterfacePCIe 3.0 x2Controller Phison E8CacheNot SpecifiedPerformance: Sequential Read / Write 1500 MB/s – read1000 MB/s – write4 KB Random 120000 IOPS – read100000 IOPS – writeLatencyNot SpecifiedMTBF1000000 hoursEnvironmental: Power Consumption0.011748 W – IdleUp to 0.458 W – ReadUp to 0.908 W – WriteTemperature0 to +70 C – Operating-40 to +85 C – StorageHumidityNot SpecifiedShock ResistanceNot SpecifiedVibration Resistance2. 17G (7-800 Hz) – Operating20 G (10-2000 Hz) – Non-OperatingDimension / Weight: Dimension3.5 x 22 x 80 mmWeight7.60 g3. Intel SSD 600p 1 TB:Check on AmazonFeatures Highlight: Extended battery life on notebooks/laptops with low power drain compared to HDDsConsistent drive performance with enhanced efficiency2 2280 form factor with support to a large range of compatible devices and most of the modern motherboards.Available from 128 GB to 1 TB capacities5 year of limited warranty from IntelGeneral: ManufacturerIntelSeries / Model600p / SSDPEKKW010T7X1Storage Type Internal Solid State DriveForm FactorM.2 2280Capacity1 TBMemory ComponentTLCInterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Controller Not SpecifiedCacheNot SpecifiedPerformance: Sequential Read / Write 1800 MB/s – read560 MB/s – write4 KB Random 155000 IOPS – read128000 IOPS – writeLatencyNot SpecifiedMTBF1600000 hoursEnvironmental: Power Consumption40 mW – Idle100 mW – ActiveTemperature0 to +70 C – operatingHumidityNot specifiedShock ResistanceNot specifiedVibration Resistance2.17 GRMS (5-700 Hz) – Operating3.13 GRMS (5-800 Hz) – Non-OperatingDimension / Weight: Dimension11.6 x 9.2 x 1.8 cmWeight9.07 g2. QLC Nand – Quad Level Cell:The QLC Nand flash storage offers at least 33% improved storage density as compared to TLC storage solutions. Each cell featured in this type of storage is capable of holding 4 bit of data. Moreover, the write cycle for QLC Nand can go as high as 1000 times per cell. Now. considering the number of bits in each cell, this rate is even better compared to TLC. Since the data is being stored in a more denser architecture, QLC offers more storage capacity while keeping the price level to equal or even lower compared to TLC.Overview:AdvantagesFewer read/write drivers required compared to other NAND memoriesMore storage capacityImproved storage densityLower PriceLimitationsA life span of QLC is as good as SLC and MLC but not better than TLCRecommend ApplicationsThe huge demand for storage and performance at lower costsBest QLC Nand Storage:Following are some of the best QLC Nand storage devices available our there:1. Intel SSD 660p 1 TB:Check on AmazonFeatures Highlight: More capacity at lower cost with Intel’s 3D NAND QLC technologyIdeal for laptops/desktops, overcome limitations of previous gen storage solutionsHigher capacity and faster read performance at comparatively low power consumption, compared to any TLC NANDAvailable with up to 2 TB of storage capacityGeneral: ManufacturerIntelSeries / Model660p / SSDPEKNW010T8X1Storage Type Internal Solid State DriveForm FactorM.2 2280Capacity1 TBMemory Component3D QLC NANDInterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Controller Not specifiedCacheNot specifiedPerformance: Sequential Read / WriteUp to 1800 MB/s4 KB Random 150000 IOPS – read220000 IOPS – writeLatencyNot specifiedMTBF1600000 HoursEnvironmental: Power Consumption40 mW – idle100 mW – activeTemperature0 to +70 C – Operating-55 to +95 C – StorageHumidity5 – 95 %Shock Resistance1000 G / 0.5 ms – operating1500 G / 0.5 ms – non-operatingVibration Resistance2.17 GRMS (5-700 Hz) – operating3.13 GRMS (5-800 Hz) – non-operatingDimension / Weight: Dimension2.38 x 22 x 80 mmWeight~ 10.00 g2. Crucial P1 1 TB:Check on AmazonFeatures Highlight: Next-gen NVMe PCIe storage interfaceImpressive read/write performance with up to 1 TB of available capacity5 years of limited warranty from the manufacturerDesigned for gamers and creators for boosting up system performance, wherever storage is involvedGeneral: ManufacturerCrucialSeries / ModelP1 / CT1000P1SSD8Storage Type Internal Solid State DriveForm FactorM.2 2280Capacity1 TBMemory Component3D QLC NANDInterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Controller Silicon Motion SM2263CacheSLC CachePerformance: Sequential Read / Write2000 MB/s – read1700 MB/s – write4 KB Random 170000 IOPS – read240000 IOPS – writeLatency~ 894.7 μsMTBF1800000 hoursEnvironmental: Power Consumption2 mW – idle80 mW – active(8W Max)Temperature0 to +70 C – Operating-40 to +85 – nonoperatingHumidity5 – 95%Shock Resistance1500 G / 0.5 msVibration Resistance3.1 GRMS (5-800 Hz)Dimension / Weight: Dimension3.14 x 0.08 x 0.86 inchesWeight0.64 ouncesConclusion:That’s it for this comparison between TLC and QLC Nand. We hope this post helps you to understand the general difference between these two types of NAND. However, feel free to ask questions in the comment section below. Follow this blog to get regular tech updates right into your inbox. For now, thank you! And see ya until next post! Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Share What's your reaction? Excited 0 Happy 0 In Love 0 Not Sure 0 Silly 0
Storage SystemsList of the Best 18 TB and 20TB Hard Disk Drives – External & Internal By IGJanuary 21, 2022
Storage SystemsCompare BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green SpecificationsThis article compares the BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green, which are entry-level SSDs that ...
PCCrucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500 Specifications ComparisonWith improvements in lithography and NAND densities, the SSDs have been getting considerably cheaper in ...
Storage SystemsList of the Best V30 SD Cards for 4K Video ProcessingIn this article, we have listed out the best V30 SD cards that are ideal ...
PCCompare Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo PlusThis post compares the Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo ...