This article compares the BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green, which are entry-level SSDs that offer excellent performance and value.
Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.
Related: Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo Plus
When SSDs were introduced, they were pretty expensive. They drastically reduced seek times, in addition, to read & write performance. In fact, what makes SSDs one of the best options in comparison to HDDs is the lack of moving parts and thus overcomes the physical limitations. The SSD, being a NAND instead of spindles, removes one of the enormous IOPS bottlenecks in the computing world.
Also Read: Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400 Specifications Comparison
Table of Contents
Check on Amazon
M.2 2280 SSD
500 GB (SATA, M.2)
1 TB (SATA, M.2)
2 TB (SATA)
350 MB / s (240 GB)
450 MB / s (480 GB, 960 GB)
180 TB (500 GB)
360 TB (1 TB)
700 TB (2 TB)
80 TB (240 GB)
160 TB (480 GB)
300 TB (960 GB)
Crucial has been one of the best options when you look ahead to faster performance. Of course, it is the more expensive option for most of your entry-level requirements. However, the SSD is a little behind in terms of performance compared to the competition.
The SSD comes with a sequential read speed of 540 MB per sec and a sequential write speed of 500 MB per sec. However, this should be compensated with the fact that the Crucial BX500 is cheaper than the MX300. The drive is available in SATA SSD format and comes in varied capacity options like 120GB, 240GB, and 480GB alternatives. The SSD is quite comparable to the WD’s Green range of DDS options.
The drive comes with secure installation options along with the Acronis’ True Image software that can help clone your existing hard drive. The endurance limit for the drive would read between 40 TBW and 120 TBW.
* Product Specs are subject to change; please visit vendor website for up to date information
WD green is one of the affordable SSD options made available by Western Digital and provides you access to one of the best features in terms of functionality. You will find the drive coming in multiple options that offer you right from 120 GB to 450 GB capacities.
The drive should be one of the best choices to go with laptops and desktop computers. This should be the perfect option for high performance and a great deal of reliability. It is even more interesting than the drive is available in both 2.5”/ 7 mm and M.2 2280 form factors. They are quite compatible with almost all your PCs and laptops.
The drive is specially designed for use with the budget segment. The SSD comes with Silicon Motion SM2258XT as a controller.
The controller comes with a RAM-less design. This would be one of the best cost-saving options; you would love to go with the affordable alternatives.
You have access to 540 MB per sec sequential read speeds and sequential write speeds of 458 MB per sec. That would make the Crucial BX500 a clear winner in comparison.
Having checked out the best features and functions offered by the two competing players like Crucial BX500 and WD Green, here is a complete side-by-side comparison between the two SSD drives. This will help you understand the features offered by the products more effectively and help you pick the best options based on the qualities you are looking ahead to.
240GB: 80TB total bytes written (TBW)
480GB: 120TB total bytes written (TBW)
Those were just a few features that would differentiate the two competing solid-state drives. The functionality should provide you with good input into what these drives would offer you.
The WD Green is perhaps something that you would not find anything near enough to the performance shown by the Crucial BX500. However, if you are looking for excellent endurance levels from your SSD drives, we recommend opting for the Crucial BX500 over the WD Green SSD. The read speed performance of the WD Green is quite limited and lower when compared to the Crucial BX500.
Check out the features as outlined in this comparison and share your experiences with us.
Comments are closed.