Storage Systems QLC vs TLC NAND SSD Disks Specifications Comparison & Differences 8991 views0 Share By Share In this article, we help you to understand better how QLC vs TLC NAND differs from each other. If you have basic knowledge about computer storage components, you might very well know how a hard disk drive differs from a solid state drive or SSD. Even if you don’t know many technical details, you may at least know that SSDs are far more superior compared to HDDs when it comes to speed and performance in accessing the stored data. The use of SSDs is increasing day by day in the latest devices. However, given to the expensive price tags on SSDs, you will find hybrid storage used by most of the people with limited budgets. Today at Face of IT, we will be discussing various types of SSDs available in the market. If you are looking for an SSD storage solution for your system, you might have come across some of the products which offer the same storage capacity but possess a significant difference in price tag. This is because their internal architecture is different, regardless of what capacity they offer. Related: Best PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD Drives Table of Contents Toggle SSD cell architecture:Nand Flash Memory:QLC vs TLC Nand:1. TLC Nand – Triple Level Cell:Best TLC Nand Storage:1. HP EX920 M.2 1 TB:2. Kingston A1000 960 GB:3. Intel SSD 600p 1 TB:2. QLC Nand – Quad Level Cell:Best QLC Nand Storage:1. Intel SSD 660p 1 TB:2. Crucial P1 1 TB:Conclusion: SSD cell architecture: Including QLC, there is a total of four types/architectures or SSDs used widely so far: Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement. SLC – single-level cell MLC – multi-level cell TLC – triple-level cell QLC – Quad level However, our computing demand in terms of both performance/speed and capacity is increasing very rapidly. Thus, QLC, a new type of flash memory had to be invented. This new type, Quad level cell allows SSDs to provide more massive capacity storage while keeping the price low. Before we discuss TLC and QLC types and go through various products available in each category, here is a quick introduction to NAND flash memory. Nand Flash Memory: Compared to conventional hard disk drives, Nand flash storage offers better, faster and cheaper media storage solutions. It is a non-volatile memory which saves data even when power is cut of mid operations. Nand flash storage is a collection of cells, which hold multiple bits. Electrical charge is used to turn these bits on and off. The organizational structure of these cells represents how SSD will store the data. For example, Single level cell or SLC holds a single bit in each cell. Same goes for MLC(double bits) and TLC(triple bits) per cell. QLC is a result of the manufacturer’s efforts towards utilizing each cell at fullest to provide faster storage solutions at cheaper costs. QLC provides 4 bits in each cell. Also Read: Seagate Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860 QLC vs TLC Nand: The anatomy of these NAND storage types is not that simple; as they possess their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages. In this section, we will discuss more TLC and QLC NAND flash storage, and address some of the best products available in this particular category. So you can choose a suitable SSD according to your requirements. Features TLC NAND QLC NAND Reads & Write Cycle 500-1000 1000 Bits/Cell 3 4 Performance 2/5 2/5 Power Consumption 0.458 W (Kingston A1000) 0.100 W (Intel 660p) $ per GB $0.2 – $0.18 $0.12 – $0.18 Advantages Low Cost More Storage Capacity Target Market Consumer SSDs High-Density Data Storage 1. TLC Nand – Triple Level Cell: As mentioned above, in the TLC structure, each cell holds 3 bits of data. As far as manufacturing cost is concerned, this type of flash memory is the cheapest to produce. However, the biggest bottleneck with this type of storage is that it is suitable for consumer level use only as it does not meet the requirements and standards required for industrial or enterprise use. Its read & write cycles are as well shorter. It ranges between 3000 to 5000 cycles per cell. Overview: Advantages Lower production cost Cheapest SSDs available in the market Limitations Shorter life span compared to SLC, MLC Recommend Applications Everyday Consumer Web Portals Email Machines Notebooks, Tablets Best TLC Nand Storage: Following are some of the best TLC Nand storage devices available our there: 1. HP EX920 M.2 1 TB: Check on Amazon Features Highlight: High performance at lower power consumption High reliability and system responsiveness Compact form factor with minimal weight Extensive ruggedness Improved data integrity and data security General: Manufacturer HP Series / Model EX920 / 2YY47AA#ABC Storage Type Internal Solid State Drive Form Factor M.2 2280 Capacity 1 TB Memory Component 3D TLC Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 Controller HP Cache 1 GB Performance: Sequential Read / Write 3200 MB/s – read 1800 MB/s – write 4 KB Random 350000 IOPS – read 250000 IOPS – write Latency 0.020 ms read latency 0.022 ms write latency MTBF 2000000 hours Environmental: Power Consumption 0.73 W (Idle) 6.23 W (Active) Temperature 0 to +78 C – Operating -40 to +85 C – Storage Humidity 5 – 95 % Shock Resistance 100 G / 6 msec Vibration Resistance 3.1 GRMS (2-500 Hz) Dimension / Weight: Dimension 3.80 x 22 x 80 mm Weight 5.40 g 2. Kingston A1000 960 GB: Check on Amazon Features Highlight: Up to 20 times better performance compared to conventional HDD, perfect for upgrading older systems 2 2280 form factor with multi-purpose SFF connector Ideal single sided and compact design for thin and light notebooks and systems with limited space Available in multiple capacities and price range General: Manufacturer Kingston Series / Model A1000 / SA1000M8/960G Storage Type Internal Solid State Drive Form Factor M.2 2280 Capacity 960 GB Memory Component 3D TLC Interface PCIe 3.0 x2 Controller Phison E8 Cache Not Specified Performance: Sequential Read / Write 1500 MB/s – read 1000 MB/s – write 4 KB Random 120000 IOPS – read 100000 IOPS – write Latency Not Specified MTBF 1000000 hours Environmental: Power Consumption 0.011748 W – Idle Up to 0.458 W – Read Up to 0.908 W – Write Temperature 0 to +70 C – Operating -40 to +85 C – Storage Humidity Not Specified Shock Resistance Not Specified Vibration Resistance 2. 17G (7-800 Hz) – Operating 20 G (10-2000 Hz) – Non-Operating Dimension / Weight: Dimension 3.5 x 22 x 80 mm Weight 7.60 g 3. Intel SSD 600p 1 TB: Check on Amazon Features Highlight: Extended battery life on notebooks/laptops with low power drain compared to HDDs Consistent drive performance with enhanced efficiency 2 2280 form factor with support to a large range of compatible devices and most of the modern motherboards. Available from 128 GB to 1 TB capacities 5 year of limited warranty from Intel General: Manufacturer Intel Series / Model 600p / SSDPEKKW010T7X1 Storage Type Internal Solid State Drive Form Factor M.2 2280 Capacity 1 TB Memory Component TLC Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 Controller Not Specified Cache Not Specified Performance: Sequential Read / Write 1800 MB/s – read 560 MB/s – write 4 KB Random 155000 IOPS – read 128000 IOPS – write Latency Not Specified MTBF 1600000 hours Environmental: Power Consumption 40 mW – Idle 100 mW – Active Temperature 0 to +70 C – operating Humidity Not specified Shock Resistance Not specified Vibration Resistance 2.17 GRMS (5-700 Hz) – Operating 3.13 GRMS (5-800 Hz) – Non-Operating Dimension / Weight: Dimension 11.6 x 9.2 x 1.8 cm Weight 9.07 g 2. QLC Nand – Quad Level Cell: The QLC Nand flash storage offers at least 33% improved storage density as compared to TLC storage solutions. Each cell featured in this type of storage is capable of holding 4 bit of data. Moreover, the write cycle for QLC Nand can go as high as 1000 times per cell. Now. considering the number of bits in each cell, this rate is even better compared to TLC. Since the data is being stored in a more denser architecture, QLC offers more storage capacity while keeping the price level to equal or even lower compared to TLC. Overview: Advantages Fewer read/write drivers required compared to other NAND memories More storage capacity Improved storage density Lower Price Limitations A life span of QLC is as good as SLC and MLC but not better than TLC Recommend Applications The huge demand for storage and performance at lower costs Best QLC Nand Storage: Following are some of the best QLC Nand storage devices available our there: 1. Intel SSD 660p 1 TB: Check on Amazon Features Highlight: More capacity at lower cost with Intel’s 3D NAND QLC technology Ideal for laptops/desktops, overcome limitations of previous gen storage solutions Higher capacity and faster read performance at comparatively low power consumption, compared to any TLC NAND Available with up to 2 TB of storage capacity General: Manufacturer Intel Series / Model 660p / SSDPEKNW010T8X1 Storage Type Internal Solid State Drive Form Factor M.2 2280 Capacity 1 TB Memory Component 3D QLC NAND Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 Controller Not specified Cache Not specified Performance: Sequential Read / Write Up to 1800 MB/s 4 KB Random 150000 IOPS – read 220000 IOPS – write Latency Not specified MTBF 1600000 Hours Environmental: Power Consumption 40 mW – idle 100 mW – active Temperature 0 to +70 C – Operating -55 to +95 C – Storage Humidity 5 – 95 % Shock Resistance 1000 G / 0.5 ms – operating 1500 G / 0.5 ms – non-operating Vibration Resistance 2.17 GRMS (5-700 Hz) – operating 3.13 GRMS (5-800 Hz) – non-operating Dimension / Weight: Dimension 2.38 x 22 x 80 mm Weight ~ 10.00 g 2. Crucial P1 1 TB: Check on Amazon Features Highlight: Next-gen NVMe PCIe storage interface Impressive read/write performance with up to 1 TB of available capacity 5 years of limited warranty from the manufacturer Designed for gamers and creators for boosting up system performance, wherever storage is involved General: Manufacturer Crucial Series / Model P1 / CT1000P1SSD8 Storage Type Internal Solid State Drive Form Factor M.2 2280 Capacity 1 TB Memory Component 3D QLC NAND Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 Controller Silicon Motion SM2263 Cache SLC Cache Performance: Sequential Read / Write 2000 MB/s – read 1700 MB/s – write 4 KB Random 170000 IOPS – read 240000 IOPS – write Latency ~ 894.7 μs MTBF 1800000 hours Environmental: Power Consumption 2 mW – idle 80 mW – active (8W Max) Temperature 0 to +70 C – Operating -40 to +85 – nonoperating Humidity 5 – 95% Shock Resistance 1500 G / 0.5 ms Vibration Resistance 3.1 GRMS (5-800 Hz) Dimension / Weight: Dimension 3.14 x 0.08 x 0.86 inches Weight 0.64 ounces Conclusion: That’s it for this comparison between TLC and QLC Nand. We hope this post helps you to understand the general difference between these two types of NAND. However, feel free to ask questions in the comment section below. Follow this blog to get regular tech updates right into your inbox. For now, thank you! And see ya until next post! Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Share What's your reaction? Excited 0 Happy 0 In Love 0 Not Sure 0 Silly 0
Storage Systems Compare BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green Specifications This article compares the BX500 vs MX500 vs WD Green, which are entry-level SSDs that ...
PC Crucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500 Specifications Comparison With improvements in lithography and NAND densities, the SSDs have been getting considerably cheaper in ...
Storage Systems List of the Best V30 SD Cards for 4K Video Processing In this article, we have listed out the best V30 SD cards that are ideal ...
PC Compare Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo Plus This post compares the Wd Black SN750 vs Sabrent Rocket 3 vs Samsung 970 Evo ...