September 25, 2018
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 vs 6000 vs 8000

Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 vs 6000 vs 8000 Specifications Comparison

In this article, we are comparing the Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 vs 6000 vs 8000 which is based on the Turing architecture.

When we talk about graphics on computers and professional graphics cards, the first name that would come to our mind is, apparently, Nvidia. Of course, they have been a massive player by any standard when it comes to graphics cards and related devices. The company recently launched three new graphics cards for the professional market – the  Quadro RTX 5000, Quadro RTX 6000 and Quadro RTX 8000.

How do they compare with each other and how do they function? Let us check it out in the following paragraphs.

The Turing Architecture Based Quadro RTX Graphic Cards

Yes, we are talking about the new range of graphics cards announced by Nvidia along with its modern architecture – Turing. In fact, Nvidia has indeed broken from its traditional mode of announcements and has come up with a range of press releases for its workstation-class GPU models.

The newly announced graphics cards include Quadro RTX 8000, RTX 6000, and RTX 5000. The new GPUs have been touted to be the fastest cads ever and are likely to be made available in the fourth quarter of the year 2018.

Turing is the new architecture developed by Nvidia and continues from where the previous architecture, Volta, left off. The new cards offer you a new age hardware ray tracing technology. This is achieved with the use of Nvidia’s latest RT cores in combination with the tensor cores in Volta. The RT cores are what would help you with the new technology of ray tracing and are stated to enhance the ray tracing by around 25 percent compared to the previous architectures viz a viz Volta and Pascal.

The CUDA cores are typically used distributed compute requirements, while the Tensor cores introduced in the Volta architecture are used for AI cognitive workloads. The new RT cores are used for the enhancement of the ray tracing technology. The Turing architecture is also believed to offer improved performance for the complex jobs, thanks to its support for hybrid rendering.

How Do They Differ from Each Other?

Well, to begin with – all three are launched using the latest Turing architecture and share most of the features between themselves. The RTX 8000 and RTX 6000 are almost similar to each other. They should offer you the same performance, bandwidth and memory performance in virtually all major aspects.

The RTX 8000 and RTX 6000 come with 4608 CUDA cores, 576 tensor cores, and GDDR6 memory. The only area that both these siblings differ is the VRAM. The RTX 8000 has a 48 GB VRAM, while the RTX 6000 offers you only 24 GB VRAM.

The third option of the lot, the RTX 5000, is a little low in terms of specs, performance standards and memory capability. The graphics card comes with 3072 CUDA cores, 384 tensor cores, and 16GB of GDDR6. The RTX 5000 can ideally be considered to be the partially enabled Turing architecture-based graphics cards from Nvidia.

The RTX 8000 also supports the  NVLink multi-GPU technology from Nvidia. This will help you in case you need to render more massive scenes on the GPU. The multi GPU technology will help you get two RTX 8000 cards and get a doubled up VRAM capacity of 96 GB. The connectivity options are pretty identical across all three graphics cards. The connectivity options available include four DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, plus a VirtuaLink port to connect future VR headsets via a USB-C connector. The “Virtual Link” standard is a connectivity option with a USB Type C alt mode. It helps you use a single cable to carry all of the video, data, and power a VR headset, thus streamlining the performance. In fact, this standard would help you tether your VR-Headsets to a video card instead of using a host of cables and their tangles.

The technology is promising enough. Of course, there are no headsets currently available as things stand now that support the technology. However, the major VR players like Oculus, Valve, and Microsoft support the technology. So, we can indeed expect the launch of the headsets that support the technology in the near future.

Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 vs 6000 vs 8000 – Comparison

If you want to compare the new Quadro RTX graphic cards introduced by Nvidia, it would be a great option to compare them in a tabular format. That would be one of the best ways to understand the concept in a more elegant way. So, here it goes!

Features / Particulars

RTX 5000

RTX 6000

RTX 8000

Number of CUDA Cores 3072 4608 4608
Number of Tensor Cores 384 576 576
Boost Clock Speed  – 1730 MHZ 1730 MHz
Memory Clock Performance 14 Gbps GDDR6 14 Gbps GDDR6 14 Gbps GDDR6
Bus width for memory 256 bit 384 bit 384 bit
VRAM Capacity 16 GB 24 GB 48 GB
Ray Performance 6 GRays per sec 10 Grays per sec 10 Grays per sec
TDP NA, likely 250 W NA, likely 250 W NA, likely 250 W
GPU  Turing Turing Turing
Architecture Support Turing Turing Turing
Compute capacity 10.6 Tflops 16 Tflops 16 Tflops

As the current information available, the update on the power consumption is not available. However, if the images released by Nvidia are to be believed, the new graphics cards are expected to pack in the standard and traditional Nvidia blower configuration. In that case, we would expect the power consumption to be either 250 W or higher.

The Concluding Thoughts

Well, that was all we have as of now when it comes to the specifications and differences between the newly launched Quadro RTX series of graphics cards from Nvidia. There isn’t much of the information available as of now except for a few rumored and leaked inputs. Everything will be clear once the graphics cards are launched later this year.

We assume the details shared here should have provided you with input into what you can expect from the new range of Turing powered workstation-class graphics cards. We would also expect the announcement of a few consumer level graphic cards soon. Until that happens, let us keep speculating.

Disclosure: We are a professional review website that sometimes receive compensation or free units from the companies whose products we review. We test each product thoroughly and give high marks to only the very best. We are independently owned and the opinions expressed here are our own.

FOLLOW @ INSTAGRAM