PCStorage SystemsCrucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500 Specifications Comparison June 30, 20211123 views0Share By IG ShareWith improvements in lithography and NAND densities, the SSDs have been getting considerably cheaper in terms of better dollars per GB. For the SSDs available, Crucial has been one of the best options among the manufacturers for the enhanced mid-range performance of your computing requirements. We will compare the best options among the several SSDs brought ahead by Crucial. Yes, we are talking about the Crucial MX500 and Crucial P1. We will compare the two products and explore the functionalities offered by them.Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.Also Read: Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400 Specifications ComparisonBefore we get into the comparing of P1 vs MX500, let us look at a similar comparison below:Table of Contents Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400Crucial P1 SSD ReviewCrucial MX500 SSD ReviewThe Comparative table: Crucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500The Parting ThoughtsMore Reading:Crucial BX500 vs MX500 vs Kingston A400Features / ParticularsCrucial MX500Crucial BX500Kingston A400Form Factor2.5 inch SATA SSDM.2 2280 SSD2.5 inch SATA SSD 2.5 inch SATA SSD InterfaceSATA 6 GB per secSATA 6 GB per secSATA 6 GB per secCapacities available250 GB (SATA, M.2)500 GB (SATA, M.2)1 TB (SATA, M.2)2 TB (SATA)120 GB240 GB480 GB120 GB240 GB480 GB960 GBSequential read speed560 MB per sec540 MB per sec500 MB per secSequential Write speed510 MB per sec500 MB per sec320 MB / s (120 GB)350 MB / s (240 GB)450 MB / s (480 GB, 960 GB)Lifetime1.8 Million hours1.5 million hours1.0 million hoursLoad capacity in TBW100 TB (250 GB)180 TB (500 GB)360 TB (1 TB)700 TB (2 TB)40TB (120GB)80TB (240GB)120TB (480GB)40 TB (120 GB)80 TB (240 GB)160 TB (480 GB)300 TB (960 GB)Warranty5 years3 years3 yearsCrucial P1 SSD ReviewCrucial P1 is the first NVMe SSD from the brand. However, it is almost equivalent to the functions offered by the rival 64-layer 3D QLC flash and a Silicon Motion NVMe SSD controller. It helps you break the barrier suffered by the slower SATA interface throughput. You should have access to sequential throughput of up to around 2 GB per sec read and 1.7 GB per sec write speed options. Internally, it works almost similar to the SATA SSD offered by Crucial – named MX500.The pricing should be pretty tricky, and the P1 is pretty competitive and a hard sell in the NVMe market. But, we found the application performance is subpar – especially given the pricing. For the average power consumption, it took around 2.5 W power for the file transfers. In the case of workloads, it should handle an excellent performance at approximately 1.7 GB per sec performance. You should find the transfer options better if you are transferring files from a faster device.The Crucial NVMe P1 offers you a considerable performance in our read tests if you are looking at the transfer speeds. Of course, the drive may not be the fastest but performs well enough.The ProsAn excellent Sequential read and write performance.A considerable file transfer times and functionsA high power efficiencyThe ConsThe application performance is observed to be lower than the average industry standard.Lower endurance levels.Crucial MX500 SSD ReviewThe best performance SSD and SATA drive compatibility would make it an excellent option for most of your requirements. Micron’s new 64-layer 3D NAND powers the Crucial MX500.The drive is made available in four capacities and two different form factors. The model will be launched with a 1 TB capacity. The drive will be made available in the capacity of 250 GB. 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB capacities. The Crucial MX500 uses the SMI SM2258 controller. While the controller is older enough, Crucial claims that the Low-Density Parity-Check or LDPC has been capable enough to power 64 layer 3D NAND.The storage executive software has been updated, and this is one of the improved options you will be observed on the new Crucial MX500. This can help you manage your drive and perform a wide range of security applications like Secure Erase. You will also have access to over-provisioning, which can help you with more space for the background operations.The ProsAn excellent performance standardAffordable and competitive pricingThe software package is one of the best in its categoryComes with host power failure protection.The ConsThe performance is slightly slower for the 1 TB capacity drive.The design appears to be a little out of place.The Comparative table: Crucial P1 vs MX500 vs BX500Having checked out the two capable SSD drives and gone through the concise reviews to understand them, a few features are explained in a side-by-side comparison. This can be pretty helpful if you are checking out the options for enhanced performance and focussing on the specific characteristics –Features / ParticularsCrucial P1 NVMe SSDCheck on Amazon – Model: CT500P1SSD8 | CT1000P2SSD8Crucial MX500 SSDCheck on Amazon (CT500MX500SSD1)Form FactorM.2 2280 S3 (Single-Sided)2.5″ 7mmInterface or protocolPCIe 3.0 x4 / NVMe 1.3SATA / AHCIControllerSilicon Motion SM2263ENSilicon Motion SM2258DRAM TypeDDR3DDR3DRAM Capacity512 MB for 500 GB1 GB for 1 TB2 GB for 2 TB256 MB for 250 GB512 MB for 500 GB1 GB for 1 TB2 GB for 2 TBCapacities available500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TBNANDMicron 64L 3D QLCMicron 64-Layer TLCSequential Read Speed1.9 GB per sec for 500 GB2 GB per sec for 1 TB and 2 TB560 MB per sec across all capacitiesSequential write speed950 MB per sec for 500 GB1.7 GB per sec for 1 TB1.75 GB per sec for 2 TB510 MB per sec across all capacitiesRandom Read Speed90000 IOPS for 500 GB170,000 IOPS for 1 TB250,000 IOPS for 2 TB95,000 IOPS across all capacitiesRandom Write speed220,000 IOPS for 500 GB240,000 IOPS for 1 TB250,000 IOPS for 2 TB90,000 IOPS across all capacitiesEncryption StandardsNAHardware AES-256 Encryption; TCG Opal 2.0 SED SupportEndurance100 TBW for 500 GB200 TBW for 10 TB400 TBW for 2 TB100 TBW for 250 GB180 TBW for 500 GB360 TBW for 10 TB700 TBW for 2 TBWarrantyFive yearsFive yearsUnder standard conditions, the MX500 has been observed to be offering a relatively good performance. In fact, under most of the normal conditions, both the Crucial P1 NVMe and Crucial MX500 were found to provide you access to almost similar experiences with a few minor differentiation.The Parting ThoughtsWe could not find a considerable difference between the two competing siblings for most practical purposes. Of course, the NVMe standard has been entirely new and may need a little getting used to. However, from the performance point of view and features thereof, we found them matching one another in most respects.Of course, The Crucial P1 is comparatively high priced yet does not promise many application performance levels. Thus it may not be a practical option to go with, especially when you choose from Crucial itself in the SATA genre. We may need to wait until Crucial comes with a formidable opportunity for the best NVMe SSD drive.More Reading:Barracuda SSD vs Crucial MX500 vs Samsung Evo 860Kingston A400 vs Q500 vs KC600 Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Share What's your reaction? Excited 0 Happy 0 In Love 0 Not Sure 0 Silly 0
PCList of the Best Laptops with Nvidia 3080Ti – Budget OptionsIn this article, we are checking out the best laptops with Nvidia 3080Ti that offer ...
PCList of the Best monitors with Power Delivery (USB PD Charging)We have one for you if you are looking for a list of the best ...
PCList of the Best HDMI 2.1 Monitors for Gaming in 2022 – Budget OptionsIn this article, we have a list of the best HDMI 2.1 monitors for gaming ...
PCList of the Best Portable OLED Monitors for External UseIf you are looking for the best portable OLED monitors for external use, we have ...