The pinnacle of PC gaming is here: glorious 4K resolution at a buttery-smooth 240Hz. But powering this dream requires a massive amount of data, sparking the ultimate showdown between DisplayPort 2.1 and HDMI 2.1a. Is DisplayPort’s raw, uncompressed bandwidth the future, or does HDMI’s clever use of Display Stream Compression (DSC) and its rich feature set win the day? This guide dives deep into the technical specs, real-world hardware, and crucial features to help you decide which cable truly reigns supreme for your bleeding-edge setup in 2025. DisplayPort 2.1 vs HDMI 2.1a | The Ultimate 4K 240Hz Showdown | Faceofit.com

The 4K 240Hz Showdown

DisplayPort 2.1 vs. HDMI 2.1a: Which Interface Reigns Supreme for Bleeding-Edge Gaming?

Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.

Published on July 31, 2025 • By The Faceofit Tech Team

The new frontier of PC gaming has arrived: 4K resolution at a blistering 240Hz refresh rate. This leap in performance demands a firehose of data, pushing video interfaces to their absolute limits. Two titans are battling for the throne: DisplayPort 2.1 with its mighty UHBR20 spec, and the ubiquitous HDMI 2.1a at its full 48 Gbps potential. But which one is truly the king? This deep dive will dissect the technology, compare the features, and give you a definitive answer.

Executive Summary: The Verdict in Brief

For those short on time, here's the bottom line: DisplayPort 2.1 is the technically superior, future-proof choice for dedicated PC enthusiasts, while HDMI 2.1a is the more versatile and convenient option for mixed-use and home theater setups.

Why DisplayPort 2.1 Wins on Tech

Its massive 80 Gbps bandwidth can handle 4K 240Hz without compression, offering technical purity. PC-centric features like Multi-Stream Transport (MST) for daisy-chaining monitors make it the power user's choice.

Why HDMI 2.1a Wins on Features

While it needs visually lossless compression (DSC) for 4K 240Hz, its feature set is unmatched for convenience. Enhanced Audio Return Channel (eARC) and Source-Based Tone Mapping (SBTM) are killer features for home theater and console users.

The current hardware reality is that no GPU can output an uncompressed 4K 240Hz signal yet. This makes the choice today about strategic foresight (DP 2.1) versus immediate ecosystem benefits (HDMI 2.1a).

The Bandwidth Battle: More Than Just a Number

At the heart of this contest is raw data throughput. DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 boasts a staggering 80 Gbps, while HDMI 2.1a tops out at 48 Gbps. But the devil is in the details—specifically, how efficiently they use that bandwidth.

DisplayPort 2.1 (UHBR20)

Total Bandwidth 80 Gbps

Effective Data Rate (Payload) 77.37 Gbps

Thanks to highly efficient 128b/132b encoding, only ~3% is lost to overhead.

HDMI 2.1a (FRL 48 Gbps)

Total Bandwidth 48 Gbps

Effective Data Rate (Payload) ~42.67 Gbps

Less efficient 16b/18b encoding results in a larger ~11% overhead.

The uncompressed data required for a 4K 240Hz 10-bit HDR signal is a massive ~72 Gbps. This simple calculation reveals a crucial truth: DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 was engineered to handle this natively, while HDMI 2.1a simply can't. This brings us to the most important technology in this entire debate...

The DSC Decider: "Visually Lossless" Compression

VESA's Display Stream Compression (DSC) is the magic that levels the playing field. It's a compression algorithm so advanced that it's officially designated "visually lossless"—meaning the human eye can't distinguish a DSC-compressed image from the uncompressed original. It adds virtually zero latency, making it perfect for gaming.

How DSC Bridges the Gap

~72 Gbps

Uncompressed 4K 240Hz Signal

DSC 1.2a

~3:1 Compression

~24 Gbps

Compressed Signal

This compressed ~24 Gbps signal fits comfortably within HDMI 2.1a's ~42.67 Gbps payload, making 4K 240Hz possible.

DisplayPort 2.1's Role

For 4K 240Hz, DSC is optional. The native bandwidth is sufficient. DSC is reserved for even more extreme future scenarios, like 8K 120Hz or dual 4K displays from one port.

HDMI 2.1a's Role

For 4K 240Hz, DSC is mandatory. Without it, the interface simply lacks the bandwidth. It's a clever and effective solution to keep HDMI competitive at the high end.

Interactive Feature Face-Off

Bandwidth is only half the story. The features packed into each standard can make or break your experience. Use the filters below to see how they stack up in different categories.

The Hardware Reality Check

A standard is only as good as the hardware that supports it. Here's where things get complicated: as of today, the full potential of DisplayPort 2.1 is still locked away.

Current GPU Support

NVIDIA RTX 40-Series

Ships with DisplayPort 1.4a. This means even the mighty RTX 4090 must use DSC for 4K 240Hz over any port.

AMD RX 7000-Series

The first with DP 2.1, but limited to UHBR13.5 (54 Gbps). This also requires DSC for 4K 240Hz.

Future GPUs (e.g., RTX 50-Series)

Expected to be the first with full UHBR20 support, finally unlocking uncompressed 4K 240Hz.

Cable & Monitor Considerations

DisplayPort 2.1

Requires a VESA Certified DP80 cable for full UHBR20 speed. Monitors with these ports are the key to "future-proofing".

HDMI

HDMI 2.1a

Requires a certified Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable. These are widely available and generally less expensive.

The Verdict: Who Should Choose What?

After all the technical jargon, the choice boils down to your priorities. While DSC makes the visual quality identical for now, the feature sets and future potential are vastly different.

Choose DisplayPort 2.1 If...

You are a bleeding-edge future-proofer planning to buy a next-gen GPU (like an RTX 5090).
Your setup is purely for PC gaming and productivity.
You need Multi-Stream Transport (MST) to daisy-chain multiple monitors with a single cable.
You value technical purity and want the option for uncompressed 4K 240Hz in the future.

Choose HDMI 2.1a If...

Your setup is mixed-use, involving a PC, game consoles (PS5/Xbox), and a TV.
You need eARC to simplify routing high-end audio (like Dolby Atmos) to a soundbar or receiver.
You want the convenience of Source-Based Tone Mapping (SBTM) for better mixed HDR/SDR content.
You are building a system with a current-gen GPU and prioritize ecosystem features over future bandwidth.

Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.