Tech Posts

AV1 Encoder Performance: Nvidia vs. AMD vs. Intel for Video

For today’s YouTube creators, pushing for higher quality 1440p and 4K video is no longer a luxury—it’s the standard. Yet, the trusty H.264 codec, the workhorse of online video for years, often struggles to keep up, leaving your high-action gameplay or detailed footage looking blocky and compressed. The solution is here: AV1, a next-generation, royalty-free codec that delivers vastly superior quality at lower bitrates.

Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our disclosure statement.

With YouTube now fully supporting AV1 for both uploads and live streams, the hardware you use to encode your content has become more critical than ever. CPU encoding is simply too slow, making a modern GPU with a dedicated AV1 hardware encoder an essential tool for any serious creator. But which GPU manufacturer offers the best solution? In this definitive guide, we put the three main contenders to the test: Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace (NVENC), AMD’s RDNA3 (VCN), and Intel’s Arc Alchemist (QSV). We’ll dive deep into quality benchmarks, raw performance speeds, and crucial software integration to help you choose the perfect GPU for your creative workflow. AV1 Encoder Showdown: Nvidia vs. AMD vs. Intel | Faceofit.com

The AV1 Hardware Encoder Showdown

A Definitive Guide for YouTube Creators on Nvidia Ada, AMD RDNA3, and Intel Arc

The New Frontier: AV1's Impact

AV1 vs. H.264: A Leap in Efficiency

AV1 delivers the same video quality as the older H.264 standard at a 30-50% lower bitrate. This means smoother, higher-quality streams for your audience and smaller file sizes for your archives.

H.264

8 Mbps

=

AV1

~5 Mbps

Same Perceptual Quality

For years, H.264 was the king of online video. But for modern creators pushing 1440p and 4K content, its limitations are a major bottleneck. Enter AV1, a royalty-free, next-generation codec from an alliance including Google, Apple, and Microsoft. Its superior compression is a game-changer, and with YouTube now fully embracing AV1, dedicated hardware encoders in modern GPUs have become absolutely critical.

Attempting to encode AV1 in real-time with a CPU is impractical for gaming. Hardware encoders are essential to make AV1 a reality for creators.

Two Workflows, One Goal: Live vs. VOD

To pick the right GPU, you must understand the two primary creator workflows, as they place very different demands on an encoder.

Live Streaming

This is a real-time, bitrate-constrained process. Your goal is to maximize visual quality within your fixed upload bandwidth. Encoder efficiency is paramount.

  • Priority: Quality-per-bit
  • Constraint: Internet Upload Speed
  • Key Metric: VMAF at 12 Mbps

Video on Demand (VOD)

This involves local recording and editing. You record at a very high bitrate to create a pristine source file, then upload it. Your priority is raw speed to minimize export times.

  • Priority: Encoding Throughput (FPS)
  • Constraint: Project Deadline
  • Key Metric: 4K Export Speed

Anatomy of the Encoders

Nvidia Ada Lovelace

Features the 8th Gen NVENC, with dual AV1 encoders on RTX 4070 Ti and above. This allows simultaneous streaming and high-quality local recording.

AMD RDNA3

Integrates VCN 4.0. Its dual encoders are split: one for AV1 and a separate one for older H.264/HEVC codecs. Supports up to 12-bit color.

Intel Arc Alchemist

The first to market with AV1 encoding. The powerful Xe Media Engine is consistent across the entire product stack, from budget to high-end cards.

Architectural Specifications

Feature Nvidia Ada Lovelace (RTX 40-Series) AMD RDNA3 (RX 7000-Series) Intel Arc Alchemist
Media Engine 8th Gen NVENC Video Codec Nucleus (VCN) 4.0 Xe Media Engine (Quick Sync)
Max AV1 Encode 8K60 8K60 8K
AV1 Bit-Depth 8-bit, 10-bit 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit 8-bit, 10-bit
Dual Encoders Yes (2x AV1/HEVC/AVC on select GPUs) Yes (1x AV1 + 1x HEVC/AVC) Yes (2x MFX Engines on some SKUs)

Understanding the Numbers: A VMAF Primer

To compare encoders, we use objective metrics. Here's a quick guide to what they mean.

PSNR

Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio. An older metric that measures raw pixel differences. Higher is better, but it doesn't always align with what our eyes see.

SSIM

Structural Similarity Index. Better than PSNR, it compares luminance, contrast, and structure. A score of 1.0 is a perfect match.

VMAF

Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion. The industry gold standard from Netflix. It uses machine learning to predict how humans perceive quality. A score of 95+ is considered excellent.

The Gauntlet: Quality & Performance

We use VMAF as our primary quality metric. Higher scores are better.

Interactive Chart: Quality-per-Bit (VMAF)

Interactive Chart: Raw Encoding Speed (FPS)

The Creator's Cockpit: Software Integration

OBS Studio

  • ✔ Nvidia: The gold standard. Mature, stable, and packed with features.
  • ✔ Intel: Excellent quality-for-price. The go-to for dedicated streaming PCs.
  • ~ AMD: Improved, but historically has faced more stability and quality issues than rivals.

Pro Tip:

For YouTube AV1, use CBR, 12-18 Mbps for 4K, a 2s Keyframe Interval, and the highest quality preset available.

DaVinci Resolve

  • ~ Nvidia: Best performance, but AV1 export is paywalled in the $300 Studio version.
  • ✔ Intel: Incredible value. Full AV1 hardware acceleration is supported in the FREE version.
  • ✔ AMD: Also supported in the free version, though some users report integration isn't as seamless as Intel's.

Adobe Premiere Pro

NO NATIVE AV1 SUPPORT

As of late 2024, Premiere Pro does not support AV1 import or export. Creators must transcode files, a time-consuming workaround that negates the benefits of recording in AV1.

Final Verdict & Persona-Driven Recommendations

The Champion of Quality & Versatility: Nvidia

For the creator who demands the absolute best, Nvidia is the leader. It consistently delivers the highest VMAF scores and its dual-encoder architecture on high-end cards is a game-changer for single-PC streaming and recording. The stability and feature set in OBS are second to none. This is the choice for the "prosumer" power user.

The Value Proposition King: Intel

Intel Arc has democratized high-quality AV1. Offering quality that is remarkably close to Nvidia's best at a fraction of the price, its value is unbeatable. It is the ideal choice for a dedicated streaming PC or for a budget-conscious creator using the free version of DaVinci Resolve, where it provides a complete, no-cost AV1 workflow.

The Speed Demon with Caveats: AMD

AMD's strength lies in its raw gaming performance. If maximizing in-game FPS is your absolute top priority, an RDNA3 card is a strong contender. However, this comes with a trade-off: its encoder is the least efficient of the three, requiring higher bitrates (and thus more bandwidth and storage) to achieve the same visual quality as its competitors.

Quick-Reference Decision Matrix

If Your #1 Priority Is... The Recommended Choice Is... Rationale
Absolute Best Image Quality Nvidia Consistently highest VMAF scores. Most mature and stable software ecosystem.
Best Value / Dedicated Stream PC Intel Near-Nvidia quality at a fraction of the price. Full AV1 support in free DaVinci Resolve.
Highest In-Game FPS AMD Often leads in raw gaming performance, but encoding quality requires higher bitrates to match competitors.
"Prosumer" Single-PC Workflow Nvidia The dual-encoder architecture is a unique and powerful advantage for simultaneous streaming and recording.
Primary Use with Adobe Premiere Pro Any Hardware AV1 encoding is currently irrelevant due to a lack of software support. Choose based on other factors.

Faceofit.com

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. An independent analysis for content creators.

Affiliate Disclosure: Faceofit.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

What's your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0

Comments are closed.

Next Article:

0 %