Remember when smartphones suddenly got taller? Around 2017, the 18:9 aspect ratio arrived and completely changed the game, especially in a value-driven market like India. Phones like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro and Asus ZenFone Max Pro M1 weren’t just new devices; they were legends that offered incredible features in a futuristic, easy-to-hold design. But in the fast-moving world of tech, legends can become relics overnight.
Today in 2025, these pioneers are available on the refurbished market for tempting prices. But should you buy one? We’ll take a deep dive into the golden age of 18:9, analyze the classics that defined it, and uncover the critical reason why buying one today could be a significant mistake.
Faceofit.com
A Deep Dive into Smartphone Evolution
The Rise & Fall of the 18:9 Phone
Why a once-revolutionary design is now a relic, and what it teaches us about buying a phone in India today.
Published July 21, 2025
The Shifting Silhouette
The shape of your phone wasn't an accident. It's the result of a fascinating tug-of-war between technology, content, and the size of our hands. The 18:9 ratio was a key battleground in this evolution, offering a brilliant solution to a growing problem: how to make screens bigger without making phones too wide to hold.
The 18:9 Advantage
- Superior Multitasking: The taller screen made Android's split-screen feature genuinely useful. Two apps could run as perfect squares, one on top of the other, revolutionizing productivity on the go.
- Cinematic Viewing: The 2:1 ratio was closer to cinematic formats than 16:9, reducing black bars and making it a favorite for streaming services like Netflix.
- More Content, Less Scrolling: Users could see more of their social feeds and webpages at a glance, a simple but profound improvement to the daily user experience.
A Visual History of Screen Shapes
3:2
(~2007)
16:9
(~2010)
18:9
(~2017)
20:9
(Present)
The 18:9 revolution made phones taller, not wider, allowing for bigger screens that were still comfortable to hold.
The Golden Age of 18:9 (2017-2018)
For a brief, shining moment, 18:9 was king. These were the devices that defined an era of incredible value and design innovation in the Indian market. Let's see how they stack up, remembering them for what they were: pioneers of their time.
Legacy Device Showdown
Model & Key Feature | Processor | Battery (mAh) | Launch OS | Original Price (₹) |
---|
Feature Face-Off
Select up to 3 devices to compare their strengths.
The Critical Compromise
Tempted by a ₹4,000 price tag on a refurbished classic? Here's the reality check. The real cost of using a vintage smartphone in 2025 isn't measured in rupees, but in risk. These phones are digital ghosts, haunted by years of unpatched security holes.
Security Risk in 2025
EXTREME
Permanently exposed to thousands of unpatched vulnerabilities (CVEs), making banking or personal data use incredibly dangerous.
The End of the Line: Software Support
Launch (2017-2018)
Shipped with Android 7/8
Final OS Update (2019-2020)
Most ended their life on Android 9
Last Security Patch (2019-2021)
Support officially abandoned by all brands
Today (2025)
Critically insecure, app incompatibility, and poor performance.
Beyond 18:9: Modern Picks for 2025
Don't buy a museum piece. The spirit of the 18:9 phone—great value and comfortable design—is alive and well. Here's what to look for instead to get a great, and more importantly, *secure* phone today.
The Compact Champions
For pure one-handed use. Look for screens under 6.2" and narrow bodies (e.g., Asus Zenfone series, Google Pixel 'a' series).
The Modern Value Kings
The true heirs to the Note 5 Pro. Look for brands like POCO, iQOO, and Motorola in the ₹15k-25k range for max performance.
Immersive Media Devices
For the best viewing experience. Prioritize phones with high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays from any major brand.
Ergonomic Flagships
Premium feel without the bulk. Look for slim profiles and curved edges from Samsung, OnePlus, etc.
Final Recommendation
While historically fascinating, buying an 18:9 phone from 2018 is a bad idea in 2025. The security risks are severe and the technology is profoundly outdated.
Our advice: Choose a modern, secure alternative.