In this article, we are going to do an ARM Cortex A75 vs Cortex A72 specifications comparison.
Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our affiliate disclosure statement.
If you want to know how good is the new ARM Cortex A75 is over the Cortex A72 then read along. Cortex A75 is the successor of the Cortex A72 and A73 designs. ARM Cortex A75 supports the company’s new DynamIQ multi-core technology. Cortex A75 is the ARM’s best processor till date, designed for high-end mobile devices.
ARM Cortex A75 vs Cortex A72
- A 72
- A 75
ARM has made several performance improvements across the board, resulting in a typical 22 percent boost to single-threaded performance over the Cortex-A72 on the same process node and running at the same frequency.
When we consider the clock speed, the Cortex-A75 is likely to top out at 3 GHz on a 10 nm wafer. But, it could also be pushed a little higher on future a 7 nm lithography process. Cortex A75 can be pushed further at the expense of extra energy power consumption.
Cortex A75 moves to a 3-way superscalar design, from 2-way in the Cortex-A72. It means that, given a particular workload, the Cortex A75 can execute up to 3 instructions in parallel per clock cycle.
The Cortex A75 now features a private L2 cache, implements as either 256 KB or 512 KB with a shared L3 cache available when implementing a DynamIQ multi-core solution. This results in a much lower latency. ARM Cortex A75 supports the Armv8-A architecture that provides broad ecosystem from tools to OS and applications support.
Overall, The ARM will not only boost the performance of an A75 based SOC but also designed a micro-architecture to be executed in a single cycle. Cortex A75 comes with over 20% more integer core performance. The high-performance NEON and FPU engines are designed to handle complex machine learning workloads. The Cortex-A75 processor provides a significant performance boost compared to the Cortex-A72 and Cortex A73 processors.
Phones with ARM Cortex A75 and Cortex A72
ARM Cortex A75 is new in the market, right now there is no SOC in the market. But sooner, the Snapdragon 845 and others will be going to release their SOCs with the Cortex A75 designs. We expect some SOCs that will feature the new Cortex A75 and Cortex A55 cores big.little cores. So you might expect phones with Cortex A75 in 2018. And for Cortex A72, we have picked some best phones. See below:
Huawei P9
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xYq1rJ”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.2-inch IPS-NEO LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~423 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 955, Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A53), Mali-T880 MP4 GPU |
Internal Storage | 32/64 GB |
RAM | 3 GB / 4 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 12 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 3000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
Huawei Honor P9 Plus
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2kkTozQ”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.5-inch Super AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~401 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 955, Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A53), Mali-T880 MP4 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 4 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 12 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 3400 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
Huawei Honor V8
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2kmg2Yv”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.7-inch IPS-NEO LCD |
Display Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels (~515 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 950, Octa-core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.8 GHz Cortex A53), Mali-T880 MP4 GPU |
Internal Storage | 32 / 64 GB |
RAM | 4 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 12 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 3500 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
Huawei Honor Note 8
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2kkaiOS”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6.6-inch Super AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels (~443 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | HiSilicon ,955, Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A53), Mali-T880 MP4 GPU |
Internal Storage | 32/64/128 GB |
RAM | 4 GB |
Primary Camera | 13 MP |
Secondary Camera | 5 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4500 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Huawei Mate 8
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2yo14aD”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6-inch IPS-NEO LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~368 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | HiSilicon Kirin 950, Octa-core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.8 GHz Cortex A53), Mali-T880 MP4 GPU |
Internal Storage | 32 / 64 GB |
RAM | 3 GB/ 4 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 3500 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xXMNjo”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6-inch Super AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~367 PPI pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.4 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | 16 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Oppo R9s Plus
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xYyrPV”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6-inch AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~367 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.44 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | 16 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Oppo F3 Plus
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xYyrPV”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6-inch IPS LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~367 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.44 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 4 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | Dual 16 MP + 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
Vivo X9 Plus
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2yoctqR”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.88-inch IPS LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~375 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.44 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | Dual 20 MP + 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Gionee M2017
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2kmGNMo”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.7-inch AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels (~515 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.4 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 128 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 12 MP + 13 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 7000 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Gionee M6S Plus
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xgLU6Y”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 6-inch AMOLED |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~367 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.44 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 / 256 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | 12 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 6020 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
Nubia Z17 Mini
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xYrWN2″]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.2-inch LTPS IPS LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~424 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 652, 653 Octa-core (4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4×1.4 GHz Cortex-A53), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 4 / 6 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 13 MP |
Secondary Camera | 16 MP |
Battery Capacity | 2950 mAh |
Operating System | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Cool Play 6
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2fOl2ne”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.5-inch IPS LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~401 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 653, Octa-core (4×1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A72), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 64 GB |
RAM | 6 GB |
Primary Camera | Dual 13 MP |
Secondary Camera | 8 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4060 mAh |
Operating System | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
[button_link size=”medium” src=”http://amzn.to/2xS56aM”]Buy From Amazon[/button_link]
Display Type | 5.5-inch IPS LCD |
Display Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels (~403 ppi pixel density) |
Processor | Snapdragon 650, Hexa-core ( 4×1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2×1.8 GHz Cortex-A72), Adreno 510 GPU |
Internal Storage | 16/32 GB |
RAM | 2 GB/ 3 GB |
Primary Camera | 16 MP |
Secondary Camera | 5 MP |
Battery Capacity | 4050 mAh |
Operating System | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) |
Conclusion
We hope you like our ARM Cortex A75 vs Cortex A72 comparison article. For any questions or suggestions, do let us know by commenting below.
Indrajit
Feedback taken. Tweaked that last line. Cheers!
Ken
Regarding your last statement: "You can get a Snapdragon 835 powered Android device at hal...
Indrajit
6 core 12 threads?